Journal of Energy and Power Technology (JEPT) is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. This periodical is dedicated to providing a unique, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary platform for researchers, scientists and engineers in academia, research institutions, government agencies and industry. The journal is also of interest to technology developers, planners, policy makers and technical, economic and policy advisers to present their research results and findings.

Journal of Energy and Power Technology focuses on all aspects of energy and power. It publishes original research and review articles and also publishes Survey, Comments, Perspectives, Reviews, News & Views, Tutorial and Discussion Papers from experts in these fields to promote intuitive understanding of the state-of-the-art and technology trends. 

Main research areas include (but are not limited to):
Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) and grid connection impact
Energy harvesting devices
Energy storage
Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
Hydrogen energy 
Fuel cells
Nuclear energy
Energy economics and finance
Energy policy
Energy and environment
Energy conversion, conservation and management
Smart energy system

Power Generation - Conventional and Renewable
Power System Management
Power Transmission and Distribution
Smart Grid Technologies
Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
Power electronic
Biofuels and alternatives
High voltage and pulse power
Organic and inorganic photovoltaics
Batteries and supercapacitors

Rapid publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 4.3 weeks after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 6 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2020, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period).

Free Publication in 2020
Current Issue: 2020  Archive: 2019
Open Access Review
Scientometric Analysis of Scheduling in Renewable Energy: A Keyword and Citation Analysis

Iman Rahimi 1, Reza Behmanesh 1, Abdollah Ahmadi 2, *

1. Young Researchers and Elite Club, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2. School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia

Correspondence: Abdollah Ahmadi

Academic Editor: Zhao Yang Dong

Received: May 21, 2019 | Accepted: November 14, 2019 | Published: November 15, 2019

Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2019, Volume 1, Issue 4, doi:10.21926/jept.1904004

Recommended citation: Rahimi I, Behmanesh R, Ahmadi A. Scientometric Analysis of Scheduling in Renewable Energy: A Keyword and Citation Analysis. Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2019;1(4):15; doi:10.21926/jept.1904004.

© 2019 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


The aim of this paper is the scientometric analysis of articles on “scheduling in renewable energy” that have been published between 2000 and 2017. For this purpose, the terms “scheduling in renewable energy” and “unit commitment in renewable energy” have been searched. We have found 1009 articles in the Scopus database which include the terms mentioned above. VOSviewer and CiteSpace, as two well-known the scientometric analysis tools, have been used. Keywords analysis and citation analysis are two analysis methods that have been used in this paper. China and the US are two countries with a high contribution to this topic among other countries. Two methods of counting, including full counting and fractional counting, have been applied. Citation analysis based on countries, document, source, author, and organization have been addressed, and results have been presented. Co-authorship and co-citation analysis also have been shown. IEEE Transactions journals have the most activity in published articles on the topic, while Energy and Engineering are two subjects with the most documents. The remaining part of the paper has focused on citation analysis and co-citation analysis based on authors, documents, sources, countries, organizations, and references.


Renewable energy; scheduling; scientometric analysis; citation analysis

1. Introduction

Unit commitment (UC) problem includes of specifying the optimal usage of power generating units during a scheduling time [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. This optimization problem usually includes many constraints, such as ramp rate, minimum up/down time, minimum/maximum generating capacity, system reserve requirements, prohibited operating zones, and emission and fuel limits [8,9,10,11]. It worth mentioning that some researchers use scheduling instead of UC [12]. There are two main types of UC problems. In security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC), the main objective is satisfying load with minimum cost while considering the network security. In price-based unit commitment (PBUC), the main goal is maximizing profit [1,8,9,12].

Modern power companies are utilizing both traditional and renewable energy resources to generate electricity [13,14]. This paper presents a Scientometric analysis for articles in the area of renewable scheduling which have been published from 2000 to 2017, for this aim, VOSviewer as a scientific tool has been used [15,16,17].

2. Keywords Analysis

The paper is divided into two parts. The first part covers the general concept of scheduling and renewable energy. The most common keywords that are used in the articles with the concept of scheduling and renewable energy are found. The second part of the paper is focused on citation analysis for the mentioned articles. To start the analysis, we have searched the keywords “scheduling and renewable energy” and “unit commitment and renewable energy” in the Scopus database. The time zone is selected from 2000 until July 2017 for the articles published, except conference papers, and book chapters by searching in “title, abstract, and index keywords” and 1009 articles have been found. Figure 1 shows the most common keywords used in the documents by full counting method, while Figure 2 presents the same visualization by fractional counting.

The colors in Figure 1 and Figure 2 represent different time zones; red color indicates early articles, and blue color shows those that have been published before 2013. The other colors are applied for articles published between these years.

Figure 3 indicates different visualization of the most common keywords. The red area has more density; the density from red area to the blue area is decreasing  so “wind power, scheduling, renewable energies and costs” which belong to the red area have the most density, and the blue area with less density covers keywords such as “social networking, optimization framework, and energy production”. There exist 268 keywords with the minimum number of 10 times occurrences, 294 keywords with the minimum number of nine occurrences, 327 keywords with eight occurrences in the documents, 380 keywords with seven occurrences in the documents, and 456 keywords with the minimum number of 6 times occurrences in each document. Table 1 and Table 2 present the ten most common keywords, with occurrence at least five times in each document, on the topic. Scheduling, Renewable energy resources, Optimization, Wind power and Costs, Renewable resource, Renewable energies, Stochastic systems, Renewable energy source, and Renewable energy are the most used keywords in the documents. Fuels, Wind speed forecasting, Economic operation, Energy conversion, social networking (online), Energy security, Hydroelectric power plant, Particle swarm optimization algorithm, Wind and solar power, and Harmony search algorithm are samples of the less used keywords in the documents.

Figure 1 Network visualization of scheduling in renewable energy by the full counting method.

Figure 2 Network visualization of scheduling in renewable energy by the fractional counting method.

Figure 3 Density visualization of keywords.

Table 1 10 most commonly used keywords.

Table 2 10 less used keywords in the area.

Figure 4 shows clustering regarding keywords found. The most density circles are located in the center where belongs to cluster 4 (demand-side management, tidal power), cluster 8 (grid, an hour ahead, integral part), and cluster 7 (electricity market, neural network, surveying). There is a tree path between clusters showing a growing cluster from one to another. For example, cluster 4 (demand-side management, tidal power) followed by cluster 2 (energy storage/renewable energy) from the top and followed by cluster 8 (grid, an hour ahead) from the bottom.

Figure 4 Clustering based on keywords.

The given pie chart in Figure 5 compares subjects in the years between 2000 and 2017. Energy is the most related subject with 55.8 percent, the next most applied subjects in this issue are Engineering, and Computer Science with 52.7 and 22.8 percent, respectively. The other subjects have been presented in Figure 5.

The given line graph in Figure 6 illustrates patterns of growing documents in the most active Journals. Overall, it can be seen from the graph that in all these journals, there is an increase in the number of documents. However, the International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems shows a smooth rise in the rate, while the number of documents in Applied Energy and IEEE Transactions on Power Systems increases significantly. Figure 7 shows the co-authorship analysis for 77 countries. China and the United States have the most collaborations among the authors, while Taiwan, in this case, has less partnership with other countries.

Figure 5 Documents by subject area (Source: Scopus).

Figure 6 Documents per year by source (the most active Journals, Source: Scopus).

Figure 7 Co-authorship analysis of the countries.

3. Citation Analysis

The next section illustrates the citation analysis of the documents. Two types of citation analysis are used. The first type is based on citation analysis of the authors, documents, sources, countries, and organization. The other type of citation is called co-citation which includes cited references, cited authors, and cited sources, and. The classification of citation is presented in Figure 8.

Figure 8 Flowchart of citation analysis of generated data.

Figure 9 Clustering with a timeline view for the citation analysis based on authors.

The given Figure 9 shows the citation analysis of the authors with a timeline from 2000 with a blue color to 2017 with a red color. The areas with the strongest links are located in the center where Wang J., Wang X., and Jadid S. exist.

Figure 10 Number of documents for each source.

Figure 10 presents the citation analysis of the sources. In the given line graph number of documents vs. some sources have been shown. It indicates a significant decline in the number of sources from above 250 to just below 50; this number then continues to decrease smoothly.

Figure 11 Citation visualization of the sources.

Figure 11 indicates a general visualization of the sources for a minimum number of at least one document. IEEE Transactions on Power System (2496), Applied Energy (638), IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (1600), and IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy (721) are among the most influential journals in citations. There are 77 countries active in developing papers on the concept of “scheduling in renewable energy.” Table 3 indicates citation analysis of the countries, showing the top active countries in the topic. United States, China, Iran, Italy, the United Kingdom, and Singapore possess the most number of documents and citations for the mentioned topic.

Table 3 Citation analysis of the countries.

Figure 12 Citation analysis of the organizations.

Figure 12 presents the citation analysis of the organizations. In the above-mentioned Figure department of electrical engineering, the department of industrial engineering, department of energy technology, and school of computer engineering have been bold and are the largest circles showing the top institutes for energy and scheduling based on citation reports. The last part of citation analysis is applied to the documents. Table 4 gives information about the citation analysis of the top articles with the highest number of citations showing the cluster they belong to and also the name of journals. The top articles belong to cluster 1 and cluster 6, where IEEE Transaction on Power Systems exists.

Table 4 Citation analysis of the documents.

For the next section, co-citation analysis is used. For this purpose, three different units are calculated.  For each of the cited references, the total strength of the co-citation links with other cited references is calculated. The cited references with the greatest total link strength have been selected. There are 29072 cited references with a minimum number of 1 cited references. The red area on the left side of Figure 13 shows the area with the most density and the highest number of cited references where Shahidehpour M., Wang J., and Litvinov E., exist.

Figure 13 Co-citation analysis regarding cited references.

Figure 14 depicts the co-citation analysis for cited authors between the years 2000 and 2017. 28189 authors have worked on “scheduling in renewable energy.” Figure 14 indicates cited authors for a minimum number of 1 citation. The highly cited authors have been located in large green circles; for example, Wang, J. (green circle) belongs to cluster 2 with 534 citations.

Figure 14 Co-citation analysis of cited authors.

The chart in Figure 15 shows changes in the number of citations versus the number of sources regarding the Co-citation analysis of the cited sources. Overall, there is a fall in the given chart. Figure 15 shows a sharp decline from 10715 sources for one citation in each source to 2019 sources for two citations in each source. However, the chart shows then smooth drop-in changes. 

Figure 15 Co-citation analysis of sources.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a scientometric analysis of “scheduling in renewable energy,” for a time zone between 2000 and 2017, has been investigated. Keywords analysis and citation analysis was the purpose of this paper. For the first one, the most common keywords have been found. Two ways of full counting and fractional counting with VOSviewer software has been used, and the ten most and the ten least common used keywords have been identified. In this part, co-authorship collaboration between countries also has been applied resulting in identifying China and the United States as countries with the highest contribution to the topic. Moreover, IEEE Transactions journals have been identified as the most activity in published articles in the field, while Energy and Engineering are two subjects with the most published articles. The second part of the analysis covers citation analysis and co-citation analysis; for this purpose, citation analysis has been categorized based on country, document, source, author, and organization. For co-citation analysis, three units, including cited references, cited authors, and cited sources, have been analyzed; for example, the highest number of cited references, Shahidehpour M., Wang J., and Litvinov E. have been identified. As a future direction, it is suggested to use other review techniques such as systematic review, bibliometric review, etc. However, the review could be addressed on the specific fields of renewable energy including biomass, solar, wind, etc.

Author Contributions 

Iman Rahimi: Principal investigator for the study, data analyses, and manuscript preparation; Reza Behmanesh: Co-investigator and manuscript preparation; Abdollah Ahmadi: Editing and proofreading the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors confirm that no competing interests exist.


  1. Aghaei J, Ahmadi A, Shayanfar H, Rabiee A. Mixed integer programming of generalized hydro-thermal self-scheduling of generating units. Electr Eng. 2013; 95: 109-125. [CrossRef]
  2. Reddy SS, Bijwe P, Abhyankar AR. Real-time economic dispatch considering renewable power generation variability and uncertainty over scheduling period. IEEE Syst J. 2014; 9: 1440-1451. [CrossRef]
  3. Reddy SS, Momoh JA. Realistic and transparent optimum scheduling strategy for hybrid power system. IEEE T Smart Grid. 2015; 6: 3114-3125. [CrossRef]
  4. Reddy SS, Bijwe P, Abhyankar AR. Joint energy and spinning reserve market clearing incorporating wind power and load forecast uncertainties. IEEE Syst J. 2013; 9: 152-164. [CrossRef]
  5. Reddy SS. Optimization of renewable energy resources in hybrid energy systems. J Green Eng. 2017; 7: 43-60. [CrossRef]
  6. Reddy SS, Bijwe P, Abhyankar AR. Multi-objective market clearing of electrical energy, spinning reserves and emission for wind-thermal power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2013; 53: 782-794. [CrossRef]
  7. Reddy SS, Bijwe P, Abhyankar AR. Optimum day-ahead clearing of energy and reserve markets with wind power generation using anticipated real-time adjustment costs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2015; 71: 242-253. [CrossRef]
  8. Karami M, Shayanfar H, Aghaei J, Ahmadi A. Scenario-based security-constrained hydrothermal coordination with volatile wind power generation. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2013; 28: 726-737. [CrossRef]
  9. Norouzi MR, Ahmadi A, Nezhad AE, Ghaedi A. Mixed integer programming of multi-objective security-constrained hydro/thermal unit commitment. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014; 29: 911-923. [CrossRef]
  10. Luburić Z, Pandžić H. FACTS devices and energy storage in unit commitment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2019; 104: 311-325. [CrossRef]
  11. Nikolaidis P, Chatzis S, Poullikkas A. Renewable energy integration through optimal unit commitment and electricity storage in weak power networks. Int J Sust Energ. 2019; 38: 398-414. [CrossRef]
  12. Aghaei J, Ahmadi A, Rabiee A, Agelidis VG, Muttaqi KM, Shayanfar HA. Uncertainty management in multiobjective hydro-thermal self-scheduling under emission considerations. Appl Soft Comput. 2015; 37: 737-750. [CrossRef]
  13. Izadbakhsh M, Gandomkar M, Rezvani A, Ahmadi A. Short-term resource scheduling of a renewable energy based micro grid. Renew Energ. 2015; 75: 598-606. [CrossRef]
  14. Rezvani A, Gandomkar M, Izadbakhsh M, Ahmadi A. Environmental/economic scheduling of a micro-grid with renewable energy resources. J Clean Prod. 2015; 87: 216-226. [CrossRef]
  15. Van Eck N, Waltman L. Manual for vosviewer version 1.6. 8. 2018.
  16. Ye C, editor Bibliometrical analysis of international big data research: Based on citespace and vosviewer. 2018 14th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD); 2018: IEEE. [CrossRef]
  17. Rahimi I, Ahmadi A, Zobaa AF, Emrouznejad A, Aleem SHA. Big data optimization in electric power systems: A review. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. pp. 55-84. [CrossRef]
  18. Liang RH, Liao JH. A fuzzy-optimization approach for generation scheduling with wind and solar energy systems. IEEE T Power Syst. 2007; 22: 1665-1674. [CrossRef]
  19. Chen S, Gooi HB, Wang M. Sizing of energy storage for microgrids. IEEE T Smart Grid. 2012; 3: 142-151. [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao C, Guan Y. Unified stochastic and robust unit commitment. IEEE T Power Syst. 2013; 28: 3353-3361. [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang R, Wang J, Guan Y. Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro. IEEE T Power Syst. 2012; 27: 800-810. [CrossRef]
  22. Wang J, Shahidehpour M, Li Z. Security-constrained unit commitment with volatile wind power generation. IEEE T Power Syst. 2008; 23: 1319-1327. [CrossRef]
  23. Sioshansi R, Short W. Evaluating the impacts of real-time pricing on the usage of wind generation. IEEE T Power Syst. 2009; 24: 516-524. [CrossRef]
  24. Su W, Wang J, Roh J. Stochastic energy scheduling in microgrids with intermittent renewable energy resources. IEEE T Smart Grid. 2014; 5: 1876-1883. [CrossRef]
  25. Chaouachi A, Kamel RM, Andoulsi R, Nagasaka K. Multiobjective intelligent energy management for a microgrid. IEEE T Ind Electron. 2013; 60: 1688-1699. [CrossRef]
  26. Palma-Behnke R, Benavides C, Lanas F, Severino B, Reyes L, Llanos J, et al. A microgrid energy management system based on the rolling horizon strategy. IEEE T Smart Grid. 2013; 4: 996-1006. [CrossRef]
  27. Morais H, Kadar P, Faria P, Vale ZA, Khodr H. Optimal scheduling of a renewable micro-grid in an isolated load area using mixed-integer linear programming. Renew Energ. 2010; 35: 151-156. [CrossRef]
  28. Borghetti A, Bosetti M, Grillo S, Massucco S, Nucci CA, Paolone M, et al. Short-term scheduling and control of active distribution systems with high penetration of renewable resources. IEEE Syst J. 2010; 4: 313-322. [CrossRef]
Download PDF
0 0