OBM Transplantation

(ISSN 2577-5820)

OBM Transplantation is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal, which covers all evidence-based scientific studies related to transplantation, including: transplantation procedures and the maintenance of transplanted tissues or organs; assimilation of grafted tissue and the reconstitution of removed organs or parts of organs; transplantation of heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreatic islets and bone marrow, etc. Areas related to clinical and experimental transplantation are also of interest.

OBM Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication, and we aim at serving the international transplant community with high accessibility as well as relevant and high quality content.

We welcome original clinical studies as well as basic science, reviews, short reports/rapid communications, case reports, opinions, technical notes, book reviews as well as letters to the editor. 

Indexing: DOAJ-Directory of Open Access Journals.

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 6 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2020, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period). A first decision provided to authors of manuscripts submitted to this journal are approximately 3.7 weeks (median values) after submission.

Current Issue: 2020  Archive: 2019 2018 2017
Open Access Editorial
Transplantation of a Kidney with an Extra-Renal Organ

Steven R. Potter *

Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas USA

Correspondence: Steven R. Potter

Special Issue: Combined Kidney Transplantation

Received: February 10, 2020 | Accepted: February 11, 2020 | Published: February 13, 2020

OBM Transplantation 2020, Volume 4, Issue 1, doi:10.21926/obm.transplant.2001100

Recommended citation: Potter SR. Transplantation of a Kidney with an Extra-Renal Organ. OBM Transplantation 2020;4(1):3; doi:10.21926/obm.transplant.2001100.

© 2020 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Keywords

Liver kidney transplantation; organ allocation; MELD; graft survival

Patients with end organ failure, be it hepatic, cardiac or pulmonary, all too often have concomitant renal dysfunction. Solid organ transplantation has become a relatively commonplace clinical undertaking, with outcomes that can be characterized as good to outstanding, depending on the donor and recipient characteristics involved. Over the past two decades in the United States, the number of deceased donor kidneys transplanted in combination with other organs from the same deceased donor has grown dramatically. The most common example, and the one for which the most data exist, is simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLK). Since adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) in 2002, the number of SLK transplants has increased more than six-fold [1].

The rapid and dramatic increase in SLK seems to have been driven primarily by the emphasis placed on serum creatinine in calculating MELD. In addition, the regulatory framework in the United States has been very permissive to SLK transplantation. Until August 2017, no Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regulatory policies existed to provide medical guidance for the suitability of ESLD candidates for SLK versus LTA. The OPTN SLK policies enacted in 2017 were developed in an attempt decrease practice variation in SLK utilization across centers and provide guidance to clinicians making decisions on providing SLK versus LTA for candidates [2]. The intended and unintended impacts of those policy changes are still emerging.

It seems clear that increasing degrees of renal insufficiency prior to liver transplant are associated with worse post-LT outcomes [3]. It is also clear that post-LT renal failure confers a poor prognosis for the recipient. These factors, along with an apparent dramatic increase in the prevalence of acute and chronic renal insufficiency in candidates awaiting liver transplantation seem to be the primary clinical drivers of the increase in SLK numbers [4,5]. The growth in annual numbers of SLK transplants has also occurred despite a relative paucity of data supporting a significant survival benefit for SLK versus liver transplant alone (LTA) in many subgroups of SLK recipients. There are more robust data supporting a survival benefit for SLK relative to LTA for those end stage liver disease (ESLD) candidates requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) prior to liver transplantation [6]. The corollary to that is that net benefit may be minimal or absent in those undergoing SLK who do not have renal failure or on long-term RRT at the time of LT.

Finally, performance of transplants combining a deceased donor kidney with a lifesaving organ from the same donor seem to be on the cusp of a revolution made possible by the increased availability of cold pulsatile machine perfusion of kidneys and emerging advances in organ preservation. These current and near-term advances make it feasible to delay the kidney transplant until after stabilization of the recipient, and seems to offer hope for markedly improved outcomes and better organ stewardship.

With this in mind, we have commissioned this special issue of OBM-Transplantation to address the current state of SLK and other combined kidney transplants and their impact on transplantation. We have chosen to focus primarily on SLK because it is the source of exciting emerging data regarding patient selection, outcomes, and techniques, and because the volume of SLK transplants performed impact the supply of deceased donor kidneys for kidney transplant alone (KTA) candidates. This is an underappreciated and important issue, because every kidney transplanted in combination with another lifesaving organ is a kidney lost to the candidates with ESRD waiting for a KTA. This is especially impactful because the kidneys that are transplanted in combination with other organs tend to have low Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) scores and thus would provide more net benefit to the KTA candidate pool than would lower quality (higher KDPI) kidneys [7]. It would seem prudent to evaluate the net cost of sending a high-quality kidney with an extra-renal organ by also including the substantial survival benefit that kidney would provide to a kidney alone recipient [8].

These are important topics for the present and future of transplantation, and we are please to present this special issue of OBM-Transplantation. We hope this issue will provide a forum for publication and an impetus to foster discussion of the role of combined kidney with other solid organ transplantation on the patients involved as well as the system-wide impact on the kidney alone candidates with ESRD waiting for life saving kidney transplant.

Author Contributions

Steven R. Potter was the sole author.

Competing Interests

The author has declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Gonwa TA, McBride MA, Anderson K, Mai ML, Wadei H, Ahsan N. Continued influence of preoperative renal function on outcome of orthotopic liver transplant (OLTX) in the US: Where will MELD lead us?Am J Transplant.2006; 6: 2651-2659. [CrossRef]
  2. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/1192/0815-12_SLK_Allocation.pdf
  3. Nair S, Verma S, Thuluvath PJ. Pretransplant renal function predicts survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.Hepatology.2002; 35: 1179-1185. [CrossRef]
  4. Pham PT, Pham PT. Clinical decision-making dilemma: Liver alone or simultaneous liver-kidney transplantatation? J Transplant Technol Res. 2012; 2: 3. [CrossRef]
  5. Hussain SM, Sureshkumar KK. Refining the role of simultaneous liver kidney transplantation. J Clin Trans Hepatol. 2018; 6: 289-295. [CrossRef]
  6. Locke JE, Warren DS, Singer AL, Segev DL, Simpkins CE, Maley WR, et al. Declining outcomes in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in the MELD era: Ineffective usage of renal allografts.Transplantation.2008; 85: 935-942. [CrossRef]
  7. Formica RN, Aeder M, Boyle G, Kucheryavaya A, Stewart D, Hirose R, et al. Simultaneous liver-kidney allocation policy: A proposal to optimize appropriate utilization of scarce resources.Am J Transplant.2016; 16: 758-766. [CrossRef]
  8. Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC, Lentine KL, Desai NM, Chapman W, et al. The life-years saved by a deceased organ donor.Am J Transplant.2005; 5: 2289-2296. [CrossRef]
Newsletter
Download PDF
0 0

TOP