Creation of an Operational Dashboard to Document Implementation of 4M’s into Primary Care in a Geriatric Patient-Centered Medical Home
Division of Geriatrics Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville TN 37212, United States
Vanderbilt University Department of Biomedical Informatics, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
† These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor: Pietro Gareri
Special Issue: Age-Related Chronic Diseases
Received: June 05, 2022 | Accepted: September 25, 2022 | Published: September 28, 2022
OBM Geriatrics 2022, Volume 6, Issue 3, doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2203205
Recommended citation: Powers JS, Atkins S, McCoy AB. Creation of an Operational Dashboard to Document Implementation of 4M’s into Primary Care in a Geriatric Patient-Centered Medical Home. OBM Geriatrics 2022;6(3):7; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2203205.
© 2022 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.
Many health systems have joined the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s (IHI) Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) movement to provide every older patient safe, high-quality care aligned with what matters most. Becoming an Age-Friendly Health System means that hospitals and health care systems reliably use a set of evidence-based practices known as the “4Ms” – What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility – to provide care for older, disabled and medically complex patients across all care settings. When applied together, the 4Ms represent a broad cultural shift to patient-centered care consistent with the mission to focus on what matters most to individuals .
Implementing the IHI’s 4Ms Age-Friendly principles into primary care is challenging because there is no best practice to notify clinicians of appropriate patients or to identify documentation of delivery. Leveraging the EHR is a potential way to automate this process. Dashboards represent information management tools which use data visualization to identify patients and display performance indicators to facilitate tracking of performance. We describe our experience in an outpatient geriatric patient-centered medical home (PCMH) developing an operational dashboard, harnessing the electronic health record to provide real-world data in a user-friendly smart sheet presenting pertinent information with drill down capability to display individual patient detail as needed. The Geriatric PCMH is a university medical center practice of 1051 patients certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as 1) utilizing clinical decision support tools, 2) demonstrating evidence-based care, 3) participating in shared decision making with patients and staff, 4) engaged in continuous practice performance measurement, and 5) providing population health management .
2. Materials and Methods
Age-Friendly principles for primary care were discussed during participation in national virtual IHI peer coaching webinars, and several iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles employed among clinic staff to define each of the 4M’s for the Vanderbilt Geriatric PCMH: 1) Mentation – being aware of cognitive impairment warning signs to prompt evaluation of cognition; prevent, identify, treat, and manage depression and delirium; identify and manage changes in mood or mental health. We identified the Mini-COG and PHQ2, 9 extracted from nursing intake documentation. 2) Medication – high-risk medications are reviewed and documented, described, and avoided. If medication is necessary, the medication does not interfere with what matters most to the patient, their mobility, or mentation. We searched for EHR medication review, and documentation of provider medication reconciliation. 3) Mobility – identify mobility limitations and ensure that each older adult moves safely every day to maintain function and do what matters. We chose ADL mobility questions and falls assessment extracted from the nursing intake, and 4) What Matters Most – what matters is asked, documented, and care aligned with health outcomes and care preferences. We searched for patient portal messages as utilization of a patient portal in an integrated health system relates to functional engagement between the patient and clinician. An Epic radar dashboard build was based on these identified data fields. Clinicians utilizing the EHR were involved in every stage of the development of the dashboard, providing usability recommendations as well as direct feedback on dashboard prototypes presented by the development team over a two-year period, with improvement in the accuracy of the data display.
This work is determined as a quality improvement project by the Vanderbilt IRB.
The EHR documentation of 4M care over a six-months operation period for the clinic population is displayed in Table 1. For the Geriatric Clinic population of 1051 patients, over a 6-month period (7-1-21 to 12-31-21) 465 patients made 726 visits. Within that time frame 94% of visits addressed all elements of 4M care, with a small proportion of visits addressing only 1-3 elements of 4M’s care. Figure 1 displays the clinic population-level data and Figure 2 shows patient-specific data. Both tools are made available in the EHR to the clinician at the time of the visit.
Figure 1 Population Level dashboard. Displays descriptive information for the clinic population, including 4M-specific data as well as other utilization data.
Figure 2 Patient Level Dashboard. Displays individual patient-specific 4M data to the clinician.
Leveraging the EHR to display simultaneous documentation of 4Ms for a primary care population may facilitate improved provider-driven interventions to provide 4Ms care to older adults. This is analogous to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) utilization of the Common Elements for Event Reporting–hospitals (CFER-H) in developing the National Patient Safety Data Dashboard to support safe inpatient care . As data visualization tools, dashboards may be powerful tools to inform clinical activity and help busy clinicians promote age-friendly patient-centered care for all levels of care, including inpatient, outpatient, home care and long-term care geriatrics quality improvement and are capable of displaying many other geriatric care parameters. Dashboards may be helpful for further documenting association between 4Ms care and other important clinical outcomes, although study of downstream clinical benefits of dashboards remains an emerging science.
The patient portal is potentially a rich data resource with potential to be a vehicle for improved communication between patients and providers , facilitate preventive care and chronic disease management [5,6,7,8], and to measure patient-reported satisfaction and shared decision making in primary care .
Automated indication of 4M care is dependent on defined search characteristics. What Matters Most is defined in our search as patient portal engagement, but specific message content is not examined. Further examination of content using natural language processing (NLP) may reveal additional data and help refine the tool. While many health systems have advanced portals and their use is expanding to include patient education and chronic disease management, disparities in access and digital health literacy present challenges to their use by patients.
A university-based patient-centered medical home demonstrates a focused attention to age-friendly care. An operational dashboard for an EHR has the potential to help inform delivery and monitoring of 4Ms care. Further dashboard development may be driven by its clinical utility.
James S. Powers, project design, data analysis, manuscript preparation. Shana Atkins, project design, coordination, manuscript review. Allison B. McCoy, search methodology, dashboard design, data collection, manuscript review.
This work is supported in part by the Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program, HRSA Grant: T1MHP39068-01-00.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
- What is an age-friendly health system? [Internet]. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; [cited date 2022 February 19]. Available from: https://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/Age-Friendly-Health-Systems/Pages/default.aspx.
- Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) [Internet]. Washington: National Committee for Quality Assurance; [cited date 2022 March 10]. Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/programs/health-care-providers-practices/patient-centered-medical-home-pcmh/.
- NPSD dashboards [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; [cited date 2022 February 18]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/npsd/data/dashboard/index.html.
- Lin CT, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty BL, Ross SE. An internet-based patient-provider communication system: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7: e47. [CrossRef]
- Wright A, Poon EG, Wald J, Feblowitz J, Pang JE, Schnipper JL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients through an electronic PHR. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27: 85-92. [CrossRef]
- Tang PC, Overhage JM, Chan AS, Brown NL, Aghighi B, Entwistle MP, et al. Online disease management of diabetes: Engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: 526-534. [CrossRef]
- Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: Randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: e12. [CrossRef]
- Cassano C. Promoting patient portal engagement. Am Nurs J. 2022. Available from: https://www.myamericannurse.com/promoting-patient-portal-engagement/.
- Forcino RC, Barr PJ, O'Malley AJ, Arend R, Castaldo MG, Ozanne EM, et al. Using collaborate, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States. Health Expect. 2018; 21: 82-89. [CrossRef]