OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. It covers all evidence-based scientific studies on integrative, alternative and complementary approaches to improving health and wellness.

Topics contain but are not limited to:

  • Acupuncture
  • Acupressure
  • Acupotomy
  • Bioelectromagnetics applications
  • Pharmacological and biological treatments including their efficacy and safety
  • Diet, nutrition and lifestyle changes
  • Herbal medicine
  • Homeopathy
  • Manual healing methods (e.g., massage, physical therapy)
  • Kinesiology
  • Mind/body interventions
  • Preventive medicine
  • Research in integrative medicine
  • Education in integrative medicine
  • Related policies

It publishes a variety of article types: original research, review, communication, opinion, case report, study protocol, comment, conference report, technical note, book review, etc.

There is no restriction on paper length, provided that the text is concise and comprehensive. Authors should present their results in as much detail as possible, as reviewers are encouraged to emphasize scientific rigor and reproducibility. 

Indexing: DOAJ-Directory of Open Access Journals.

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 11.7 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in the second half of 2021, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period). A first decision provided to authors of manuscripts submitted to this journal are approximately 6.8 weeks (median values) after submission.

Current Issue: 2022  Archive: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Open Access Review

A Scoping Literature Review on Compassion-Focused Therapy for Individuals with Intellectual Disability

Lucia D. Willems 1, Stefania V. Vacaru 1,2,*, Hannelies Hokke 1,3, Paula S. Sterkenburg 1,3

  1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  2. Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  3. Bartiméus, Oude Arnhemse Bovenweg 3, Doorn, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Stefania V. Vacaru

Academic Editor: Chris Irons

Special Issue: Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) – New Insights and Outcomes

Received: May 30, 2022 | Accepted: August 12, 2022 | Published: August 24, 2022

OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine 2022, Volume 7, Issue 3, doi:10.21926/obm.icm.2203037

Recommended citation: Willems LD, Vacaru SV, Hokke H, Sterkenburg PS. A Scoping Literature Review on Compassion-Focused Therapy for Individuals with Intellectual Disability. OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine 2022;7(3):26; doi:10.21926/obm.icm.2203037.

© 2022 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract

Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are at a higher risk of shame and self-criticism and tend to make downward social comparisons. Compassion-focused therapy (CFT) is commonly used to address these issues in the general population, however, information on the adaptability and effectiveness of CFT for individuals with ID is limited. Thus, we conducted a scoping review of studies on CFT for individuals with ID, to accumulate and consolidate the information and provide a basis for future studies to further develop, alter, and implement CFT for individuals with ID. To conduct this review, we searched eight databases and included descriptive studies, reviews, and empirical peer-reviewed English and Dutch studies. We focused on ID and also included concurrent visual and intellectual disabilities, compassion-focused therapy, compassion, shame, self-criticism, and social comparison. Seven articles were included in the review. We found that CFT can be adapted for individuals with ID and can effectively reduce self-criticism and downwards social comparison. Thus, CFT can promote the well-being of individuals with ID. However, the methodologies of these studies had several limitations, for example, the lack of standardized instruments or protocols for individual or group therapy. While CFT is adaptable and clinically relevant for individuals with ID, its limitations need to be addressed in future studies. In this review, we highlighted and elaborated on the limitations of the research conducted and provided suggestions for the next steps in the field. We provided an overview of the current studies on CFT and ID and highlighted their positive therapeutic effects. Future studies should design robust protocols through collaborations between clinicians and researchers to provide clients with appropriate support and determine the clinical and statistical significance of CFT.

Keywords

Compassion-focused therapy; intellectual disability; compassion; well-being; scoping review; treatment

1. Introduction

1.1 Intellectual Disabilities

Growing up and living with an intellectual disability (ID) has significant socioemotional challenges for individuals and their families. About 1% of individuals worldwide suffer from ID [1]. From a young age, individuals with ID are at a high risk of developing psychopathology, possibly due to stigmatization and prejudices [2], and high chances of encountering traumatic or adverse life events [3]. Together, these aspects make individuals with ID highly vulnerable, which not only is a burden to the individual but also holds significant societal implications [4]. Particularly, social and healthcare policies promote programs for integrating and including individuals with ID in the workforce [5], education system [6], and community [7]. Although these programs often rely on the ability of individuals with ID to acquire skills and strategies for adapting to the environment and, in turn, the ability of the environment to cater to the needs of these individuals, greater attention must be paid to the emotional profile and experiences of individuals with ID [8].

The integration of individuals with ID might be hindered by their self-perception (e.g., self-concept) [9]. Shame, for instance, is a commonly reported experience, which is characterized by feeling inferior, worthless, devalued, or undesirable [10,11]. However, studies on the reports of the first-person experiences of shame in individuals with ID are limited [12]. Shame is a limiting factor for self-to-other relations and increases downward social comparisons. A compassionate approach might help to reduce negative thoughts and feelings. While traditional therapeutic approaches, such as cognitive behavioral therapy [13], promote new ways of thinking about oneself, the thoughts often remain at a rational level, while the individuals might still deeply feel shame and anger [14]. Thus, different therapeutic approaches need to be considered depending on the individual being treated.

1.2 Compassion-Focused Therapy

Compassion-focused therapy (CFT) is based on social psychology and attachment theory and is a therapeutic approach that helps individuals develop compassion toward themselves [15,16]. Gilbert [15] postulated that CFT is a multimodal approach that integrates empathy, sensitivity, non-judgmental views, sympathy, care for tolerance, and well-being, among others. CFT aims to train the reasoning, sensations, attention, and behaviors of individuals and create feelings of warmth. The attachment system plays a fundamental role in developing these skills of compassion [17]. Complex and life-long schemas of acceptance and soothing practices are established within the earliest experiences of an individual with ID and their primary attachment figure [18]. Soothing behaviors affect stress biology and influence the regulation and production of hormones, such as the stress hormone cortisol (e.g., de-stressing may lead to a decrease in cortisol release) and the so-called love hormone oxytocin (e.g., physical affective touch can lead to increased oxytocin release) [19], which in turn affect physical and psychological well-being. From an early age, sensitive care promotes the physiological balance between several biological systems leading to optimal behaviors of self-care or other-care [20]. Thus, signals received from others can activate the attachment system and facilitate different care behaviors in an individual, based on what they have learned from the earliest relationships [21]. A threatening signal, for example, a shameful experience, can trigger a cascade of negative thoughts, behaviors, and distress. However, the same experience can also be interpreted positively, for example, by eliciting soothing thoughts and being compassionate toward oneself [22]. This is the goal of CFT interventions.

Correlational evidence has shown that CFT can improve self-compassion and self-esteem in clients without ID [23,24,25]. Moreover, in CFT, the well-being of individuals with chronic psychological problems can be promoted by teaching them to soothe themselves with kindness and to view themselves in a non-judgmental manner [26]. CFT is a third-generation therapeutic strategy [27] and can be adapted to the needs of the individual. In the past, efforts were made to also adapt CFT for individuals with ID [28]. Compassionate approaches were applied by practitioners in clinical settings; however, CFT for ID (henceforth CFT-ID) was empirically investigated only recently. Cooper and Frearson [29] pioneered the field by publishing a case study on CFT-ID, which besides highlighting the usefulness of the intervention and providing an example of how CFT can be adapted for individuals with ID, also elucidated numerous issues to be addressed in future studies, such as the lack of standardized outcome measures. Further adaptations were made for group CFT-ID [12,30], showing the clinical relevance, feasibility, and acceptance of the therapeutic intervention. While these studies provide strong clinical evidence for the feasibility of CFT-ID, statistical evidence on the effectiveness of CFT-ID is lacking. Only in one study, a group without ID was compared to individuals with ID after implementing CFT-ID, and their ability to generate and use a compassionate image after a single therapy session was assessed; the results showed that there were no differences between the groups [31]. The abovementioned studies have different conclusions regarding the adaptations and use of CFT-ID, which makes it difficult to extrapolate and formulate evidence-based guidelines.

1.3 The Current Study

To advance our understanding of CFT for individuals with ID, in this study, we collected information on the current state of CFT by performing a qualitative scoping review. We identified the adaptations, effects, and social validity of CFT-ID. We also discussed the limitations and suggested some strategies to address certain issues in this field. Scoping reviews of research fields summarize the scope of studies to identify problems and future directions [32]. Accordingly, we provided a substantive overview of the recurrent themes in the literature and formulated a working framework for future studies by addressing the following questions: 1) How was CFT adapted for individuals with ID? 2) What were the effects on behavioral and cognitive outcomes in individuals with ID? 3) How suitable was CFT deemed by individuals with ID?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Design

A structured approach proposed by Kable and Pich [33] was used to document the search strategy for this scoping review on CFT for individuals with ID. Additionally, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist (PRISMA-ScR) was used for high-quality reporting [34].

This review did not involve the participation of humans, animals, plants, or subjects, and thus, no ethical approval was required.

2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Three steps were used to screen the published studies and identify relevant papers: 1) title screening, 2) abstract screening, and 3) full-text review. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The inclusion and exclusion criteria.

2.3 Search Strategy

Several databases were searched till May 10th, 2021, including CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, APA PsychArticle, ERIC via EBSCO host, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase. The search terms included “intellectual disabilities”, “learning disabilities”, “compassion-focused therapy”, and their variations combined with Boolean search operators AND and OR. The complete list of the search strategy, including the number of papers found in each database, is provided in Appendix 1. Based on this search, 141 papers were found. After removing 39 duplicate papers, 102 papers were identified for step 1, i.e., title screening. Through this screening process, 55 papers were excluded. In step 2, the remaining 47 papers were screened by abstract; another 35 papers were excluded, and 12 papers remained. In step 3, the 12 full-text papers were thoroughly read and assessed; six papers were excluded, and six remained. Finally, one Dutch pilot study was added to the final selection, which did not appear in the database search. This paper was jointly written by the third and the final authors of this review and matched the inclusion criteria. Finally, seven papers were selected for the analysis (for an illustration of this process, see the flowchart in Figure 1).

Click to view original image

Figure 1 The flowchart of the identification and the selection processes.

2.4 Characteristics of the Studies

A summary of the studies included in this scoping review is provided in Table 2. The reference numbers in the running text are denoted as superscripts and correspond to papers in Table 2. Of the seven studies included, one was conducted in the Netherlands7, and the remaining six were conducted in the UK1–6. Two studies described group CFT interventions2, 5, four described individual interventions1, 3, 6, 7, and one was a conceptual review with case studies4. The duration of the therapy ranged from one session1 to 12–15 weeks of therapy6. The target population included individuals with mild to moderate ID in all the studies, except for one study, which included individuals with ID and concurrent visual impairments7. Only one study compared two groups of samples, one with ID and one without ID1. Sample sizes ranged from one client3 to 39 clients1, with ages ranging from 16 to 65 years. The primary outcome measures included self-compassion, self-criticism, self-esteem, coping strategies, and self-soothing. The secondary outcome measures included psychological problems and well-being. Four studies2, 5–7 used either the Self-Compassion Scale [35] or the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form [36]. All studies, except one, used a mixed approach, including quantitative and qualitative data1–3, 5–7. Five studies reported pre-intervention and post-intervention effects2, 3, 5–7, and two of these also reported follow-up measurements at one or three months post-intervention6, 7.

Table 2 Summary of the studies included.

2.5 Coding Procedure

The third author and another researcher read all the selected papers until they had a good overview of the topics mentioned in the papers. Then, they made notes indicating the themes of the papers. The themes and sub-themes were extracted independently and discussed. The last author went through all the papers, after which, the themes and sub-themes were discussed until a consensus was reached. The first author then imported all the papers to Atlas.ti, version 22.1.4.0 [37], and coded all the relevant quotes to the three core themes that were investigated in this study, which included “adaptations”, “effects”, and “social validity of CFT”. A list of topics was obtained belonging to each of the three themes, which were further categorized into additional sub-themes, forming a hierarchical coding frame. The first, second, and final authors discussed and reached a consensus on the final coding frame. Thus, the core themes and the sub-themes were obtained using an inductive approach during the coding process, based on the quotes coded. The Atlas.ti-coding frame, including all the codes of the quotes, is provided in Appendix 2.

3. Results

The sub-themes identified from the reviewed papers were structured under the three core themes of 1) adaptations made to CFT, 2) effects on clients, and 3) social validity of CFT (Table 3). The reference numbers in Table 3 correspond to the numbered papers in Table 2.

Table 3 The identified themes and sub-themes of CFT-ID.

3.1 Adaptations Made to CFT

3.1.1 Language and Understanding

The use of concrete and simplified language was the most prominent aspect of the adaptations of CFT for ID. The treatment included concrete psychoeducational materials and exercises2, 7, based on which the depth and complexity of the concepts of CFT were reduced1, 3, 4, 6. To enhance understanding and memory, the clients were suggested to review materials in-between sessions2–7 and use a supportive workbook2. Additionally, the clients were often asked to summarize and repeat the materials3.

3.1.2 Modality

The adaptations of CFT included the use of visual materials for psychoeducation, such as colorful diagrams, visual prompts, and images, to facilitate the understanding of verbal material2–6. Likewise, most studies incorporated imagination, where the clients were asked to visualize either a compassionate image or a safe place1–4, 6, 7, sometimes also stimulating other senses like hearing, touch, and smell (for example by imagining the sense of objects, fabrics, and listening to sounds and music)4, 7.

3.1.3 Guidance

The adaptations regarding guidance during therapy included scaffolding and prompting during the compassionate image exercise with reassurance that there was no right or wrong answer1. Another important aspect that was highlighted in some studies was the involvement of caregivers or the lack thereof. In one study, caregivers were invited to engage more when the clients needed to practice exercises in-between sessions4.

3.1.4 Implementation

Compassion-focused therapy increases experiential and practical exercises instead of relying solely on verbal explanations3–5. One technique involves the simple but effective practice of smiling in the mirror4. In a study, clients were asked to smile at their reflection for about 30 s, either alone or with a caregiver, to enhance positive feelings. The clients reported feeling happier during and after the exercise. Other adaptations regarding the implementation of CFT involved more breaks during sessions5 and a reduction in the speed and content of the sessions1, 3. This entailed slowing the pace and asking the client only one question at a time to provide them with adequate processing time. Additionally, the implementation of CFT was changed based on the requirements of the client4, and materials and activities that suited the interests and personal environment of the clients were selected. For example, choosing the senses to focus on during the compassionate image task depended on the interests of the client7. These sub-themes are illustrated in Figure 2.

Click to view original image

Figure 2 The network of theme A: Adaptations. Legend: G = grounded (the number of quotations the label is linked to); D = density (the number of other labels the label is linked to).

3.2 Effects on Clients

3.2.1 Primary Outcome Measures

Self-Compassion. Self-compassion was the primary focus of the reviewed studies. Generally, the intervention successfully increased self-compassion5, 7, although some studies reported no significant changes from pre-intervention to post-intervention2, 3. However, in one study, self-compassion was not significantly higher immediately after the intervention but increased considerably after a four-week follow-up7. This finding highlighted the potential long-term effects of CFT. A qualitative study found that clients with ID were as able as the participants in the control group to generate a compassionate image and use it as a form of soothing1. Similarly, one client enjoyed the compassionate exercises and repeated them continuously, while another client stopped self-verbal aggression, which suggested a more compassionate approach of the client toward themselves4. The clients also reported improvements in self-understanding, self-acceptance, the regulation of negative emotions, and a reduction of shame and self-criticism2. Self-compassion was further subdivided into common humanity, social comparison, coping strategies, and the flow of compassion.

Common humanity refers to the awareness that others share similar positive and negative experiences and feelings, and therefore, experiencing these emotions is not shameful. In a study that implemented group therapy, the clients reported the experience of de-shaming by sharing their experiences with one another2. Interestingly, before implementing CFT, some clients were afraid of sharing their experiences with others, while post-intervention, they reported feeling “normal”6.

Social comparison involves comparing oneself to others. In this study, we focused on downward or negative social comparisons, which emerge from feeling shame [10]. The clients reported less negative social comparison with others post-intervention than at the start2, 5.

Coping strategies entail 1) self-soothing images and thoughts and 2) searching for social support. For self-soothing images, the clients were asked to perform visualization exercises, such as producing a compassionate image or safe-place imagery. The clients reported a decrease in distress6 and an increase in the frequency of performing these exercises post-CFT7. Furthermore, the clients with ID could generate a compassionate image and compassionate words like the clients without ID, although they required more prompts1. However, not all studies using visualization exercises reported positive results following the exercises4. The clients with ID searched for social support more often than those without ID to solve a problem1, and the use of this coping strategy for solving a problem was more frequent post-CFT7.

Flow of compassion is the ability to provide compassion to oneself and others and to receive compassion from others. From the reviewed studies, we found that the clients who underwent CFT were not only more compassionate toward themselves but also others and reported feeling more confident in receiving compassion from others2, 5. In another study, although the flow of compassion was not explicitly described, the clients reported the calmness of the therapist, which might suggest their acceptance of compassion from the therapist6.

Self-Criticism & Self-Esteem. Self-criticism refers to being judgmental and harsh toward oneself, probably because the individual feels inferior or inept. Two studies found a significant decrease in self-criticism before and after CFT2, but not for all clients6. Additionally, feelings of self-hatred decreased, but feelings of self-inadequacy increased3. Finally, one study found an increase in self-esteem following CFT7.

Psychological Problems, Well-being, and Problematic Behavior. Studies on the changes in mental well-being showed mixed results. In a CFT group intervention, psychological well-being did not change significantly2. In a case study, the level of distress increased3, which led to doubts regarding the effectiveness of CFT in all clients. Some clients might benefit from other approaches or a combination of therapies. In contrast, other studies reported mood improvements5 and a reduction in anxiety post-CFT6; however, these findings could not be replicated elsewhere4. Along with standard instruments, some authors used a self-report pictorial mood monitoring scale3, 7, with which mood improvements were reported. Additionally, several mental and behavioral changes occurred post-CFT, such as a lower number of flashbacks and fewer sadness-related and trauma-related symptoms. Moreover, one client cleared hoarded objects in her room with the help of a therapist and stopped self-verbal aggression4.

3.2.2 Secondary Outcome Measures

Regarding secondary outcomes, some clients reported initial fear, blocks, and resistance toward compassion (e.g., finding the compassion exercises strange or stupid, or having difficulty being kind to oneself when one is used to being critical)2. However, these clients overcame these challenges by trusting the therapist, modeling their behavior, and practicing repeatedly. Other secondary outcomes included improvements in managing emotions and developing confidence and connections5. Another secondary effect involved a better understanding of situations6. The clients reported a positive change in emotions, bodily sensations, and perception of themselves after undergoing CFT. These sub-themes are illustrated in Figure 3.

Click to view original image

Figure 3 The network of theme B: Effects. Legend: G = grounded (the number of quotations the label is linked to); D = density (the number of other labels the label is linked to).

3.3 Social Validity of CFT

3.3.1 Understanding CFT

Although clients with ID required additional prompting, and their descriptions were less elaborate compared to those of individuals without ID, they clearly understood the compassionate image exercise1. Based on the information obtained from the semi-structured interviews and focus groups held with the clients after the CFT intervention, the studies found that other successful exercises were the safe-place imagination exercise, the smiling-in-the mirror exercise, and various calm breathing exercises3, 4, 6. The experiential and visualization exercises were recalled more often than the cognitive exercises3–6. Moreover, clients preferred performing the experiential exercises and reported feeling positive during these exercises, which indicated additional physiological effects5. The concepts of CFT were generally less understood. For example, clients reported understanding the rationale behind the tricky brain, but this concept might still have been abstract2. Although clients understood that the circular representations of their feelings of sadness and happiness could increase or decrease, it remained unclear whether they understood that the circles represented their feelings4. Visual aids were crucial for understanding and recollecting the concepts of CFT5.

3.3.2 Experiences of the Clients

The clients were asked about their opinions and experiences during CFT. Generally, clients enjoyed the therapy session and found it useful, particularly, the visual elements and the experiential exercises2, 3, 5–7. Some clients also enjoyed the group CFT interventions because of the opportunity to meet new people and learn that others might share similar feelings and experiences5. Moreover, they found the group to be safe and accessible2. Some clients also provided constructive feedback5 by requesting the company of another client of the same gender for group intervention and to discuss the examples of the clients more extensively during the sessions.

3.3.3 Suitability of CFT for Individuals with ID

Compassion-focused therapy is particularly suitable for individuals with ID, as CFT is primarily behavior- and skill-based, which makes it easier for clients with ID to understand CFT2, 4–6. However, even with the experiential exercises, repetition and regular practice were key to effective recollection4. The involvement of the caregiver outside the CFT sessions was particularly interesting. The lack of involvement of a caregiver might be the reason for the lack of improvements in clients3. Caregiver support was found to be important to integrate compassion into the daily lives of the clients4. Thus, friends and caregivers should engage more in CFT interventions5, 7. These sub-themes are illustrated in Figure 4.

Click to view original image

Figure 4 The network of theme C: Social Validity. Legend: G = grounded (the number of quotations the label is linked to); D = density (the number of other labels the label is linked to).

4. Discussion

In this review, we summarized the key themes from studies on CFT concerning adaptations of CFT for individuals with ID, its effects on behavioral and cognitive outcomes, and the suitability and social validity of CFT. We included seven studies after searching eight databases and handpicking one article. Six of these studies were on CFT interventions for individuals with mild-to-moderate ID, and one sample also presented concurrent visual impairments. One study was a conceptual review that reported cases of individuals with ID. Our study showed that CFT intervention can be successfully adapted for individuals with ID.

Most adaptations involved changing the language, the modality of delivery, providing guidance, and implementing the intervention. To make CFT suitable for individuals with ID it is necessary to adopt easy and concrete language, and this observation matched the findings of some studies that language encoding and comprehension skills of individuals with ID are often limited [39,40]. To help recall the materials, therapists often asked clients to review the materials between sessions, used workbooks, and also asked the clients to verbally summarize the contents. Memory domains were often impaired in individuals with ID [41,42]. However, overcoming these challenges is possible by adapting the modality of delivery with the use of visuals and providing a multimodal sensory experience to the clients (i.e., touch, smell, etc.), as performed by some of the reviewed studies. Similarly, an integrative literature review indicated that memory performance in individuals with ID depends not only on the cognitive abilities of individuals but also on the type of tasks and modality of presentation, with visual modalities showing higher memory performance preservation compared to other sensory modalities [43]. Additionally, besides linguistic and modality adaptations, our theme analysis showed that clients with ID might require additional guidance through prompting and scaffolding. Scaffolding is important to engage and promote understanding of the task [44] and can improve problem-solving abilities and performance, as found in a study on students with ID [45]. As a part of the guidance, the involvement of caregivers contributed positively to the outcome of the intervention. However, one study showed that the absence of some expected therapeutic effects was due to the lack of involvement of the caregivers3. Idusohan-Moizer et al. [46] described the importance of the involvement of caregivers to foster motivation in clients to engage in therapy. It is also important to be aware of a general lack of confidence in one’s skills and the fears of making mistakes in individuals with ID [47] and to reassure clients that no answer is right or wrong. Some studies have also focused on the implementation of CFT for ID. These studies found that it is necessary not only to adapt the materials in language, modality and guidance but also in how the therapy is carried out, for example by offering more practical and experiential exercises instead of cognitive exercises. Additionally, CFT adaptations involved providing more breaks to clients within each session and reducing the speed and the content of therapy. Anecdotal evidence from two studies suggested2, 5 that clients might also benefit more from group therapy, which allows them to share their feelings and experiences with others. This practice is key to developing compassion toward oneself and others. This corroborates previous findings indicating that group therapy for individuals with ID provides a sense of alliance in overcoming the needs of the clients [48]. Finally, we found that at least 10 sessions are required to allow for enough repetition for clients to deeply engage and remember the skills learned.

The effects of CFT-ID were subdivided into primary and secondary outcomes. For primary outcomes, the adapted CFT-ID led to substantial improvements in self-compassion, self-esteem, self-criticism, psychological well-being, and problematic behaviors. These results mirror those of a large systematic review of third-wave therapies (to which CFT belongs) for individuals with ID, which showed positive effects on psychological and behavioral problems [49]. However, the results for the effects of CFT-ID were mixed, probably due to the use of non-validated instruments for individuals with ID and/or the lack of norm scores for clinical ranges. Additional effects observed included positive secondary outcomes, such as an increase in confidence and the development of meaningful connections, reduction of fear toward compassion, better management of emotions, and understanding changes. Although the management of emotion emerged as a secondary outcome, this topic needs to be empirically investigated in the context of ID, given that the regulation of emotion is a core deficit for individuals with ID [50] and remains largely understudied [51].

Overall, the adapted CFT-ID resulted in a generally well-accepted intervention with positive outcomes and good social validity. This was achieved by making the intervention easily understandable and the exercises enjoyable, better recollection of the material through visual cues, providing feedback to the clients, and involving caregivers. Although these adaptations were useful to clients with ID, the theoretical foundations of the CFT treatment must be incorporated (for a detailed discussion see Patterson et al. [52]). Rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) need to be conducted with large sample sizes and good instruments.

4.1 Limitations of the Reviewed Studies

Several limitations need to be acknowledged in this study, and thus, our findings should be interpreted with caution. Some of the reviewed studies lacked rigorous designs, and thus, discerning the effects of CFT might not be possible. For example, only one study included a control group1, whereas, others used case-studies3 or within-participants designs2, 5, 6, 7 and often performed only one post-CFT assessment2, 3, 5. One study included individuals with ID and visual impairments, potentially adding a confounding factor when investigating the effectiveness of CFT-ID7. Future studies should conduct rigorous RCTs to establish causal inferences and determine the efficacy of CFT for individuals with ID, thus making CFT-ID an evidence-based treatment [53]. Sample sizes were very small (1–39 and most often 3)1, 2, 5, 7, which might have contributed to the mixed findings. One limitation of longitudinal studies is the restricted time period between assessments, which might affect the strength and the validity of the findings3. Thus, future studies should perform repeated assessments with longer gaps between them, as suggested by a study on CFT meta-analysis [54]. Cowles et al.4 concluded that group therapy might be more effective than individual therapy, given the positive effects on common humanity and the flow of compassion. We found that all types of CFT can have positive effects on the clients, depending on the goals of the therapy. Individual therapy might focus more on the strengths and challenges of the individual, whereas, group therapy might focus more on social dynamics and the flow of compassion. One limitation regarding the intervention is the number of sessions, which varied greatly in the studies reviewed. For example, in a study by Goad and Parker5, which is an extension of a study by Clapton et al.2, the authors increased the number of sessions from six to ten and concluded that this might have improved the abilities of the clients to apply the learned skills to their daily lives. The measures used might also be unsuitable since they were often not validated for individuals with ID. Therefore, better instruments need to be developed that can perform more accurate measurements and provide good psychometric validity for individuals with ID to obtain reliable results1, 2, 3, 5, 6. For example, there was neither a validated instrument to measure shame in individuals with ID2 nor to measure self-criticism3, although they were sometimes assessed through the subscale of larger instruments2, 5, 6, 7. Even when measures were validated for individuals with ID, psychometric data on the validity and reliability of the scale were lacking, and no cut-off point was determined for a clinical range5. Other limitations included 1) the lack of testing the instruments for individuals with ID1, 2) the lack of long-term assessments2, 3) the limited range of answers for the mood thermometer3, 4) self-report bias6, 5) the difficulty for individuals with ID to understand the statements despite adaptations5, and 6) the lack of outcome measures in the conceptual review4. Thus, the external validity of CFT-ID remains unknown. It is unclear if and for how long clients benefit from the exercises and the skills learned in therapy. Moreover, in some studies, clients were also provided other interventions (i.e., mindfulness) before undergoing CFT. This increased the uncertainty regarding whether the effects reported in the study were due to CFT alone, a mix of the two interventions, or mindfulness only7. Future studies need to address these limitations by comparing CFT to other therapies, such as Mindfulness, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, or Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing4, 7.

Finally, some general aspects that might improve the therapeutic effects include the openness of the clients to therapy, the involvement of caregivers7, and therapeutic alliance4. Along with providing CFT interventions to clients, therapists also need to be well-trained to apply the techniques and exercise self-reflection [55,56,57].

4.2 Strengths & Limitations of the Study

This was the first study to review and summarize the studies published on CFT-ID and discuss the limitations and future considerations. Some limitations of this study need to be considered. We searched for studies published till May 10th, 2021; thus, newer studies might have been omitted. Only one study fitted our inclusion criteria, which investigated gender/masculinity conceptualization in individuals with ID following CFT intervention [58]. The findings of that study were similar to our findings concerning improvements in the psychological outcomes following CFT intervention and had some of the limitations mentioned above. Also, our search terms might not have been fully exhaustive, especially considering that the search was performed in English and Dutch only.

4.3 Recommendations and Future Directions

The field of CFT-ID is still in its infancy, presenting scarce and heterogeneous evidence. Although the efforts of the reviewed studies are commendable, they represent a preliminary but strong basis to advance the development of the field by creating and publishing standardized protocols. Our findings might encourage studies on CFT-ID based on RCTs across countries and generations. We found that studies on CFT intervention for children and adolescents are lacking. Considering that nurturing compassion from an early age has long-lasting benefits, adaptations of CFT should also address activities for young clients. More attention should be paid to which treatment strategy works for whom and why to indicate how standardized protocols might be tailored to specific individuals. Additionally, future RCTs should control for non-specific effects, such as breaks from regular day-to-day programs, by including active (treatment-as-usual) control groups or should consider this as a limitation when using wait-list controls [59]. Moreover, for achieving good therapeutic alliance and compliance, and also to address challenging behaviors of individuals with ID, the need for a client to attach to a secure base needs to be considered [60,61]. Similarly, by giving importance to emotion regulation skills for coping strategies and challenging behaviors in individuals with ID, future studies should investigate the mechanisms through which CFT might act on these.

We proposed that the domains, including attentional deployment and cognitive change of the Modal Model, provide a strong framework to address the topics of shame and compassion [62]. While a full description of this is beyond the scope of our review, we would like to highlight this relationship for future studies to adopt while investigating compassion in individuals with ID. The Modal Model is a model of regulation of emotion and highlights the person-situation interaction that involves attentional systems depending on the person’s goals and the attributed meaning to the situation. This model suggests that focusing on threatening information is imperative for maintaining symptoms or negative schemas. Cognitive change refers to the mechanism by which the same situation might be appraised in a different way than the one that was learned earlier. For example, when encountering a threatening signal, negative thoughts, behaviors, and distress might arise and lead to the experience of shame. However, the same situation might also be interpreted positively through re-appraisal, for example, by eliciting soothing thoughts and being compassionate toward oneself. These processes need to be further examined empirically in individuals with ID and should be considered in the adaptations of CFT-ID. Although executive functions were investigated in individuals with ID, the focus was mostly on ‘cold’ tasks (involving cognitive information processing only), while ‘hot’ tasks (involving information related to emotion, reward, and motivational processes) were ignored [63,64]. Thus, these need to be integrated into the fields of ID and compassion-related research.

5. Conclusions

This study provided a framework for designing future studies to investigate the effectiveness of CFT for individuals with ID. Our findings might have important implications for clinicians and researchers. Based on the adaptations of the CFT intervention, the effects on the cognitive and behavioral outcomes of the clients, and the suitability of CFT for clients with ID, CFT can be considered to be a promising intervention for individuals with ID. However, the published studies have considerable methodological limitations, which might be addressed by conducting large, rigorous RCTs, using validated instruments for individuals with ID, and testing the impact of individual and group CFT interventions in future studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Vernandi Dyzel and Floor Jurriëns for their support during the literature search.

Author Contributions

HH contributed to the study conceptualization, conducted the literature search, selection of papers and preliminary theme analyses. LDW ran all the theme analysis. LDW and SVV wrote the first draft of the manuscript and revised the manuscript based on feedback from PSS. PSS contributed to the study conceptualization, coordinated the study and provided feedback for the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

ZonMW Academische Werkplaatsen in de Langdurige Zorg (Grand nr. 60-6410098101). PSS was funded by Bartiméus Fund (Grand nr. P00238).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Additional Materials

The following additional materials are uploaded with this paper.

1. Appendix 1: Search Strategy.

2. Appendix 2: Atlas.ti CFT-ID coding frame.

References

  1. Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32: 419-436. [CrossRef]
  2. Wallander JL, Dekker MC, Koot HM. Psychopathology in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: Measurement, prevalence, course, and risk. In: International review of research in mental retardation. San Diego: Academic Press; 2003. pp.93-134. [CrossRef]
  3. Wigham S, Emerson E. Trauma and life events in adults with intellectual disability. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2015; 2: 93-99. [CrossRef]
  4. Neijmeijer LJ, Didden R, Nijman HLI, Kroon H. Assertive community treatment for people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and mental health problems or challenging behavior: State of the art and implementation in the Netherlands. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2018; 15: 329-342. [CrossRef]
  5. Lysaght R, Cobigo V, Hamilton K. Inclusion as a focus of employment-related research in intellectual disability from 2000 to 2010: A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 1339-1350. [CrossRef]
  6. Clarke LS, Haydon T, Bauer A, Epperly AC. Inclusion of students with an intellectual disability in the general education classroom with the use of response cards. Prev Sch Fail. 2016; 60: 35-42. [CrossRef]
  7. Thorn SH, Pittman A, Myers RE, Slaughter C. Increasing community integration and inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009; 30: 891-901. [CrossRef]
  8. Sappok T, Došen A, Zepperitz S, Barrett B, Vonk J, Schanze C, et al. Standardizing the assessment of emotional development in adults with intellectual and developmental disability. J Appl Res Intell Disab. 2020; 33: 542-551. [CrossRef]
  9. Chien T, Sterkenburg PS, Prahl C, Anderson N, Bos A. Self-concept and facial appearance of individuals with an intellectual disability: A scoping review. Br J Learn Disab. 2020; 48: 84-97. [CrossRef]
  10. Clapton NE, Williams J, Jones RSP. The role of shame in the development and maintenance of psychological distress in adults with intellectual disabilities: A narrative review and synthesis. J Appl Res Intell Disab. 2018; 31: 343-359. [CrossRef]
  11. Gilbert P. What is shame? Some core issues and controversies. In: Shame: Interpersonal behavior, psychopathology, and culture. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp.3-38.
  12. Clapton NE, Williams J, Griffith GM, Jones RS. ‘Finding the person you really are… on the inside’: Compassion focused therapy for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2018; 22: 135-153. [CrossRef]
  13. Cooney P, Tunney C, O'Reilly G. A systematic review of the evidence regarding cognitive therapy skills that assist cognitive behavioural therapy in adults who have an intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intell Disab. 2018; 31: 23-42. [CrossRef]
  14. Irons C, Lad S. Using compassion focused therapy to work with shame and self-criticism in complex trauma. Aust Clin Psychol. 2017; 3: 1743.
  15. Gilbert P. Introducing compassion-focused therapy. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2009; 15: 199-208. [CrossRef]
  16. Gilbert P, Irons C. Focused therapies and compassionate mind training for shame and self-attacking. In: Compassion. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005. pp.275-337. [CrossRef]
  17. Depue RA, Morrone-Strupinsky JV. A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: Implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behav Brain Sci. 2005; 28: 313-349. [CrossRef]
  18. Bretherton I. Internal working models of attachment relationships as related to resilient coping. In: Development and vulnerability in close relationships. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. pp.3-27.
  19. Insel TR, Young LJ. The neurobiology of attachment. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2: 129-136. [CrossRef]
  20. McGlone F, Walker S, Ackerley R. Affective touch and human grooming behaviours: Feeling good and looking good. In: Affective touch and the neurophysiology of CT afferents. New York: Springer; 2016. pp.265-282. [CrossRef]
  21. Farr J, Ononaiye M, Irons C. Early shaming experiences and psychological distress: The role of experiential avoidance and self‐compassion. Psychol Psychother. 2021; 94: 952-972. [CrossRef]
  22. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. An attachment perspective on compassion and altruism. In: Compassion. Abingdon: Routledge; 2017. pp.187-202. [CrossRef]
  23. Leaviss J, Uttley L. Psychotherapeutic benefits of compassion-focused therapy: An early systematic review. Psychol Med. 2015; 45: 927-945. [CrossRef]
  24. Thomason S, Moghaddam N. Compassion‐focused therapies for self‐esteem: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psychol Psychother. 2021; 94: 737-759. [CrossRef]
  25. Irons C, Heriot‐Maitland C. Compassionate mind training: An 8‐week group for the general public. Psychol Psychother. 2021; 94: 443-463. [CrossRef]
  26. Gilbert P, Procter S. Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self‐criticism: Overview and pilot study of a group therapy approach. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2006; 13: 353-379. [CrossRef]
  27. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther. 2004; 35: 639-665. [CrossRef]
  28. Cowles M, Randle-Phillips C, Medley A. Compassion-focused therapy for trauma in people with intellectual disabilities: A conceptual review. J Intellect Disabil. 2020; 24: 212-232. [CrossRef]
  29. Cooper R, Frearson J. Adapting compassion focused therapy for an adult with a learning disability—A case study. Br J Learn Disab. 2017; 45: 142-150. [CrossRef]
  30. Goad EJ, Parker K. Compassion-focused therapy groups for people with intellectual disabilities: An extended pilot study. J Intellect Disabil. 2021; 25: 661-679. [CrossRef]
  31. Brougham L, Pert C, Jahoda A. Exploring the ability of individuals with an intellectual disability to generate and use a compassionate image. J Appl Res Intell Disab. 2020; 33: 1296-1306. [CrossRef]
  32. Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017; 29: 12-16. [CrossRef]
  33. Kable AK, Pich J, Maslin-Prothero SE. A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 32: 878-886. [CrossRef]
  34. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Prisma extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 467-473. [CrossRef]
  35. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity. 2003; 2: 223-250. [CrossRef]
  36. Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self‐compassion scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011; 18: 250-255. [CrossRef]
  37. Hardiman M, Willmoth C, Walsh JJ. Cft & people with intellectual disabilities. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2018; 12: 44-56. [CrossRef]
  38. Zoutenbier Y, Hokke H, Sterkenburg P. Pilotstudie naar de inzet van een compassietraining voor mensen met een visuele, lichamelijke en lichte tot matige verstandelijke beperking. Tijdschr LVB Onderz Prakt. 2020; 18: 12-22.
  39. Marrus N, Hall L. Intellectual disability and language disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin. 2017; 26: 539-554. [CrossRef]
  40. Van den Bos K, Nakken H, Nicolay P, Van Houten E. Adults with mild intellectual disabilities: Can their reading comprehension ability be improved? J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007; 51: 835-849. [CrossRef]
  41. Lifshitz H, Kilberg E, Vakil E. Working memory studies among individuals with intellectual disability: An integrative research review. Res Dev Disabil. 2016; 59: 147-165. [CrossRef]
  42. Levén A, Lyxell B, Andersson J, Danielsson H, Rönnberg J. Prospective memory, working memory, retrospective memory and self-rated memory performance in persons with intellectual disability. Scand J Disabil Res. 2008; 10: 147-165. [CrossRef]
  43. Lifshitz-Vahav H, Vakil E. Taxonomy of moderators that govern explicit memory in individuals with intellectual disability: Integrative research review. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2014; 3: 101-119. [CrossRef]
  44. Widajati W, Mahmudah S. Promt scaffolding in learning life skills for self-development of intellectual disabilities students in inclusive primary school. J Pendidik Indones. 2022; 11. doi:10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.33962. [CrossRef]
  45. Frank B, Simper N, Kaupp J. Formative feedback and scaffolding for developing complex problem solving and modelling outcomes. Eur J Eng Educ. 2018; 43: 552-568. [CrossRef]
  46. Idusohan‐Moizer H, Sawicka A, Dendle J, Albany M. Mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for adults with intellectual disabilities: An evaluation of the effectiveness of mindfulness in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015; 59: 93-104. [CrossRef]
  47. Salt E, Melville C, Jahoda A. Transitioning to adulthood with a mild intellectual disability—young people's experiences, expectations and aspirations. J Appl Res Intell Disab. 2019; 32: 901-912. [CrossRef]
  48. Reddy V. Inpatient group therapeutic interventions for patients with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2015; 19: 51-57. [CrossRef]
  49. Patterson CW, Williams J, Jones R. Third‐wave therapies and adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. J Appl Res Intell Disab. 2019; 32: 1295-1309. [CrossRef]
  50. Girgis M, Paparo J, Kneebone I. A systematic review of emotion regulation measurement in children and adolescents diagnosed with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021; 46: 90-99. [CrossRef]
  51. Mcclure KS, Halpern J, Wolper PA, Donahue J. Emotion regulation and intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009; 15: 15, 38-44.
  52. Patterson C, Williams J, Jones RS. DBT and intellectual disabilities: The relationship between treatment fidelity and therapeutic adaptation. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2020; 14: 61-67. [CrossRef]
  53. Bhaumik S, Gangadharan S, Hiremath A, Russell PSS. Psychological treatments in intellectual disability: The challenges of building a good evidence base. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 198: 428-430. [CrossRef]
  54. Ferrari M, Hunt C, Harrysunker A, Abbott MJ, Beath AP, Einstein DA. Self-compassion interventions and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness. 2019; 10: 1455-1473. [CrossRef]
  55. Beaumont E, Irons C, Rayner G, Dagnall N. Does compassion-focused therapy training for health care educators and providers increase self-compassion and reduce self-persecution and self-criticism? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016; 36: 4-10. [CrossRef]
  56. Kolts RL, Bell T, Bennett-Levy J, Irons C. Experiencing compassion-focused therapy from the inside out: A self-practice/self-reflection workbook for therapists. New York: Guilford Publications; 2018.
  57. Rayner G, Beaumont E, McAndrew S, Irons C. Exploring the impact of a compassion-focused therapy training course on healthcare educators. Health Educ J. 2021; 80: 712-723. [CrossRef]
  58. Searle RJ, Borseti I, Price KM. Compassion‐focused therapy group for men with intellectual disabilities who had maladaptive conceptualisations of masculinity. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2022; 16: 69-75. [CrossRef]
  59. Hamelin J, Travis R, Sturmey P. Anger management and intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2013; 6: 60-70. [CrossRef]
  60. Diener MJ, Monroe JM. The relationship between adult attachment style and therapeutic alliance in individual psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy. 2011; 48: 237. [CrossRef]
  61. Janssen C, Schuengel C, Stolk J. Understanding challenging behaviour in people with severe and profound intellectual disability: A stress‐attachment model. J Intellectual Disabil Res. 2002; 46: 445-453. [CrossRef]
  62. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychol Inq. 2015; 26: 1-26. [CrossRef]
  63. Costanzo F, Varuzza C, Menghini D, Addona F, Gianesini T, Vicari S. Executive functions in intellectual disabilities: A comparison between Williams syndrome and down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34: 1770-1780. [CrossRef]
  64. Predescu E, Sipos R, Costescu CA, Ciocan A, Rus DI. Executive functions and emotion regulation in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and borderline intellectual disability. J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 986. [CrossRef]
Announcement
Newsletter
Download PDF Supplementary File Download Citation
0 0

TOP