Journal of Energy and Power Technology (JEPT) is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. This periodical is dedicated to providing a unique, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary platform for researchers, scientists and engineers in academia, research institutions, government agencies and industry. The journal is also of interest to technology developers, planners, policy makers and technical, economic and policy advisers to present their research results and findings.

Journal of Energy and Power Technology focuses on all aspects of energy and power. It publishes original research and review articles and also publishes Survey, Comments, Perspectives, Reviews, News & Views, Tutorial and Discussion Papers from experts in these fields to promote intuitive understanding of the state-of-the-art and technology trends. 

Main research areas include (but are not limited to):
Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) and grid connection impact
Energy harvesting devices
Energy storage
Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
Hydrogen energy 
Fuel cells
Nuclear energy
Energy economics and finance
Energy policy
Energy and environment
Energy conversion, conservation and management
Smart energy system

Power Generation - Conventional and Renewable
Power System Management
Power Transmission and Distribution
Smart Grid Technologies
Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
Power electronic
Biofuels and alternatives
High voltage and pulse power
Organic and inorganic photovoltaics
Batteries and supercapacitors

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 4.3 weeks after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 6 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2020, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period).

Current Issue: 2021  Archive: 2020 2019
Open Access Original Research
Performance Investigation of a Nickel Cermet Anode Modified with Copper, Alkaline Earth Metal Oxide, Boron, and Perovskite for Direct Methane Fuel Cell

Andrew C. Chien 1,2,*, Eric Y. Lin 1, Nicole J. Ye 1

1 . Department of Chemical Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan

2 . Green Energy Development Center, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan

Correspondence: Andrew C. Chien

Academic Editor: Robin T. White

Special Issue: In Situ and Operando Characterization of Hydrogen Fuel Cells

Received: April 26, 2021 | Accepted: June 01, 2021 | Published: June 11, 2021

Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2021, Volume 3, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/jept.2102024

Recommended citation: Chien AC , Lin EY, Ye NJ. Performance Investigation of a Nickel Cermet Anode Modified with Copper, Alkaline Earth Metal Oxide, Boron, and Perovskite for Direct Methane Fuel Cell. Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2021;3(2):13; doi:10.21926/jept.2102024.

© 2021 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


The metallic copper, alkaline earth metal oxide, boron, and perovskite were incorporated on the surface of a Ni-cermet anode, and the performance of the modified Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) anode was evaluated. The cell performance was analyzed by voltage-current characteristics (V-I curve) and H2-CH4 step reactions (P-t curve) in a potentiostatic mode. Besides, we also determined if a metallic phase or high electronic conductivity of the anode is important for a cell to perform well when H2 is used as a fuel, whereas both conductivity and anti-coking capability are critical while using CH4 as a fuel. The results showed that the anodes containing magnesium oxide (MgO), lanthanum strontium titanate (La0.4Sr0.4TiO3−γ), and boron were relatively resistant to the degradation in the CH4 environment when compared with others. The underlying mechanism varied mainly with electronic and structural promotion by the dopants as well as their material compatibility with the Ni-cermet substrate. These findings were evidenced and supported by surface analysis as well as in-situ infrared and mass spectroscopic studies too.


Alkaline earth metal; boron; LST; SOFC; coking; infrared

1. Introduction

The conversion of methane (CH4) into valuable chemicals or electric power is of continuous interest in both academia and industry because of surging global energy demands. Methane is the predominant component of natural gas, while to date, the widely adopted route for the conversion is still the conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) over nickel-based catalysts [1]. Due to the endothermic nature, the SMR reaction is highly energy-intensive, along with the need for large capital investment. As a result, a more economically feasible way is pursued to reduce the cost and increase energy efficiencies.Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) have received much attention in the past decades for the conversion of hydrocarbons such as methane and biogas to electric power with high efficiencies. SOFCs are operated at high temperatures, where modest reaction kinetics could be achieved using nonprecious metal catalysts [2]. Nevertheless, irreversible deactivation remains the major challenge over the state-of-the-art Ni cermet anodes because of carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning when methane is used as a fuel.

Several approaches have been investigated to circumvent the degradation of Ni cermet anodes for the utilization of hydrocarbons in SOFCs [3,4,5,6]. Application of steam reforming reaction to the Ni cermet anode inside SOFCs was first proposed. However, the development of internal steam reforming was found to be hindered since a high ratio of steam/methane (H/C) was required to depress carbon accumulation. The high proportion of steam leads to dilution of fuel with low energy efficiency and adds to the complexity of heat management. In the past decade, various perovskites materials such as (LaSr)(CrMn)O3 [5], (LaSr)TiO3 [7], BaZrCeYYbO3 [8], and Sr2Mg1-xMnxMoO [9] have been considered as alternative anode materials with great interest. These ceramic anode materials did not only show improved tolerance tocarbon deposition in CH4 but also presented good stability when subjected to redox cycles. However, cell performance with these anodes of Ni-free metal oxide was lowerthan those demonstrated by conventional Ni-cermet anode supported ones. The drawbacks were attributed to lack of active sites, low conductivity, material mismatch, and formation of undesirable phases [10,11].

Surface modification or the addition of a protective top layer on the Ni-cermet anode is an effective method to avoid coking in Direct Methane Fuel Cells. Several groups and we have reported that adding a functional layer sustains a stable electrochemical performance of the Ni-cermet anode in CH4 [12,13,14,15,16]. The layer either functions as a catalyst to decompose CH4 or serves as a reforming zone for the conversion of oxidation products.In addition, the insertion efficacy of alkaline earth metal oxide on the Ni-cermet anode has also been demonstrated for the reduction in coking [17,18,19,20].The inclusion of basic oxides increases the Lewis basicity of the anode and allows chemisorption of oxidation products, including H2O and CO2, with subsequent reactions and removal of deposited carbon [6,18,21,22]. The content of basic oxide and the possible phase reaction in the anode composite have shown pronounced effects on the activity of methane oxidation and coking resistance. Nonetheless, the addition of basic oxides such as CaO, MgO, or BaO was effective in some studies, while the effects were not obvious in others [17,19,23]. Moreover, the addition of alkaline earth metal oxide to the anode is done through an impregnation method. Although the uniform distribution of the oxide particles can be achieved in the interstitial Ni sites by the wet method, the procedures could be tedious with multiple heating cycles.

On the other hand, the incorporation of rare-earth metal oxides and boron into a Ni-based catalyst resulted in a reduced coke formation [24,25,26].Rare-earth metal oxides have been claimed to stabilize Ni particles on a catalyst support, acting as a structural promoter to improve the metal dispersion and to suppress the aggregation of Ni grains. The influence of boron on the activity and acidity of a catalyst has been known, mainly arising from better metal dispersion through structure control and metal-boron electronic interaction [27,28,29]. Nevertheless, no application of any boron promotor to a SOFC anode has been reported in the literature so far. In the present work, we modified the surface of a Ni-cermet anode with copper, alkaline earth metal oxide, boron, and perovskite via a solid-state reaction. The idea of using solid-state synthesis was motivated by the need to develop a simple way that can be adapted to current cell manufacturing methods such as tape-casting or die-pressing. The cell performance with these modified anodes was investigated by voltage-current characteristics and power density versus time in a potentiostatic mode. In situ surface analysis of these anodes was conducted by diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTs) to probe the mechanism responsible for coking resistance relevant to the electrode process in detail.The results obtained here gave a complementary study with those in literature and provided valuable information to design an effective anode material for fuel cell applications.

2. Experimental

2.1 Material Synthesis

All electrochemical tests were carried out on an electrolyte-supported SOFC. The cell was composed of electrolyte support (yttrium stabilized zirconia, 8 mol.% Y2O3 doped in ZrO2), a cathode (Lanthanum strontium manganite, LSM), a cathode interlayer (LSM/YSZ, 50/50 wt.%), an anode interlayer (NiO/YSZ, 50/50 wt.%), and an anode (modified NiO/YSZ, 70/30 wt.%). The composition of the modified NiO/YSZ anodes and their preparation is described below. The electrolyte-supported cell was fabricated by die pressing. The electrolyte (~ 4.5 g), anode interlayer (~ 2.5 g), and anode (~ 0.8 g) were pressed (3000 psi) together in a die to form a half-cell, which was then sintered and calcined at 1400 °C for four hours. The cathode slurry consisting of LSM/YSZ and pure LSM was then screen printed on the electrolyte side of the sintered half-cell and calcined at 1200 °C for two hours. The obtained bottom cell was circular in shape with a diameter of about 2 cm.

2.2 Modification and Characterization of NiO/YSZ Anode

Four types of modified NiO/YSZ anodes were prepared by incorporating metal, alkaline earth metal oxide, inorganic element, and perovskite. The metal modified anode was prepared by sputtering copper on the surface of the NiO/YSZ at a deposition rate of 3.5 Å per second (Plasma treatment system, KD-SPUTTR). Two different sputtering times of 20 and 60 min were applied to obtain an estimated thickness of 420 and 1260 nm, respectively. The other three materials were introduced by mixing an additive with NiO/YSZ in the anode layer (the amount was fixed at 1 wt.% of the anode layer unless otherwise specified), followed by pressing and calcination to alter surface properties. The following additives were mixed with NiO/YSZ i) alkaline earth metal oxide: calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), calcium oxide (CaO), and magnesium oxide (MgO), ii) inorganic element: boric acid (H3BO3), and boron powder (B), and iii) perovskite: lanthanum strontium titanate (LST, La0.4Sr0.4TiO3−γ). The LST powder was synthesized via a solid-state reaction [30,31], whereas the boric acid was incorporated via a wet impregnation method. Briefly, boric acid was first dissolved in dilute nitric acid, added dropwise to the NiO/YSZ matrix, and then annealed in air at 500 °C. The steps were repeated to achieve a loading of 1 wt.%. Surface structure and morphology analysis were conducted by a scanning electron microscope (SN 4000).

2.3 Electrical Performance

Figure 1 shows the testing apparatus used in the study. The cell was assembled with two silver foils (as a current collector) and attached to one end of a ceramic tube by silver conductive paste (Alfa Aesar). The area of the layer of silver conductive paste on the cathode was about 1 cm2 and used as an active area for performance normalization. The cell was then placed in a furnace at room temperature and heated in a He (purity 99%) stream. As the temperature arrived at 750 °C, fuel gas (50 vol.% H2 and CH4 diluted in He) was introduced from the bottom of the tube to the anode, while the cathode was left exposed to air. The electrical performance of each cell was measured by its voltage-current (V-I) curve using a potentiostat (VersaSTAT3–400). The comparison between the performances in H2 and CH4 was obtained by operating the cell in a potentiostatic mode and recording the output of the electric power.

Click to view original image

Figure 1 Schematic of a SOFC testing apparatus.

2.4 In Situ Infrared Spectroscopy Studies

Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTs) was used to investigate the reaction mechanism and intermediates of CH4 oxidation on the modified NiO/YSZ anode. The IR spectra were collected by an IR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet iS10) attached with a diffuse reflection accessory (the Praying MantisTM, Harrick). About 0.1 g of anode powder obtained after crushing and grinding the sintered anode disk was loaded into a high-temperature reaction chamber covered with a dome. The reactant gas containing CH4 (10 sccm) and O2 (2 sccm), both diluted with helium(50 sccm), was used without further purification. The composition of the reaction effluent from the DRIFTs reactor was monitored by a mass spectrometer (MS, Hiden Analytical, HPR 20). The mass/electron ratios (m/e) in the MS were selected for H2 (2), He (4), CH4 (15), H2O (18), CO (28), O2 (32), and CO2 (44). The MS response for H2 and CO was obtained by subtracting the CH4 fragment intensity from the total MS response at m/e = 2, and subtracting the CO2 fragment intensity from the total MS response at m/e =28, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Cell Performance in H2 and CH4

The voltage and power density versus current density (V-I-P plot) characteristics curves of the four modified anodes in H2 at 800 °C are shown in Figure 2. The copper metal modified NiO/YSZ anode showed the best performance with a current density of 240 mA cm–2 and a power density of 50 mW cm–2. The cell performance improved as the time of coating was increased from 20 to 60 min. The alkaline earth metal oxide modified anode also showed an improved cell performance, except the 5 wt.% MgO-Ni/YSZ one. For inorganic element modified anodes, the one impregnated with boric acid gave a higher current and power density, while an inferior performance was observed for the B-modified anode. Besides, the anode containing LST performed the worst among all in H2.

Click to view original image

Figure 2 V-I-P plots of a SOFC with different modified anodes in H2 at 800 °C.

Figure 3 presents power density versus time (P-t curve) characteristics of different anodes when the fuel was switched from H2 to CH4 in a potentiostatic mode. The results showed that the cells modified with 5 wt.% MgO, LST, and B were relatively resistant to degradation in CH4. However, the one with Cu, CaO/Ca(OH)2, and H3BO3 showed no improvement in comparison with the pristine NiO/YSZ. In particular, the power density of the 5 wt.% MgO and LST modified cells was found to increase drastically upon exposure to CH4. The enhancement in the cell performance probably resulted from the rapid reaction kinetics on the electrode in CH4 than that in H2. The activity of the anode and the cell performance were correlated and further studied with in situ IR spectroscopy.

Click to view original image

Figure 3 Power density vs. time (P-t curve) curves of the modified anodes in a potentiostatic mode (at constant potential = 0.7 V unless specified), gas environment: 0-30 min in H2/He and 30-120 min in CH4/He.

3.2 In-Situ IR and Mass Spectroscopy

Figure 4 depicts the DRIFTs spectra when the modified anodes were reduced in H2 at 700 °C. The results showed that the reducibility of the anode followed an order of pristine NiO/YSZ > boron > LST > 5wt.% MgO modified NiO/YSZ (from high to low). The extent of reduction was indicated by the intensity of the Ni-O bond assigned with a band at 667 cm–1, which shifted down with a more reduced anode material as monitored during the reduction. The reducibility and the cell performance in H2 were found to be well correlated (Figure 2 and 4), indicating that high electrical performance was obtained for a more metallic or reduced anode. Figure 5 further illustrates the correlation with the MgO modified cell, demonstrating that the power density of the rarely reduced anode was low in H2, while the performance was enhanced when it was exposed to CH4. The reduction on the anode was manifested in CH4 due to the depletion of the Ni-O bond as the corresponding Ni-O band shifted continuously. However, it again shifted upward after introducing O2 flow over the CH4 exposed anode. Reversible band shifting confirmed the position of the Ni-O band as the redox reaction of Ni-NiO occurred.

Click to view original image

Figure 4 DRIFTs spectra of modified anodes on reduction in H2 at 700 °C.

Click to view original image

Figure 5 a) P-t curve of 5 wt.% MgO-NiO/YSZ anode and b) DRIFTs spectra of the anode subjected to various gas atmospheres, including H2, CH4, and O2 at 700 °C.

The MS profiles of the eluting gaseous species produced on the modified anode upon exposure to CH4 are shown in Figure 6. The results showed that the syngas, i.e., H2 and CO were the major gaseous products formed on all the anode materials. The H2 production followed a consistently increasing trend with the electrochemical performance in CH4 (Figure 3 vs. Figure 6). Among all,the 5 wt.% MgO modified anode gave the best cell performance along with stable syngas production. The molar ratio of H2 to CO in the syngas was about 2 to 1, implying that the primary reaction engaged partial oxidation of methane. Besides, the rapid decrease in the concentration of CO2 and H2O suggested the involvement of a secondary reaction, consuming these by-products.

Click to view original image

Figure 6 MS profiles of gaseous products formed on the pristine and modified NiO/YSZ anodes exposed to CH4 at 700 °C.

The above experimental results demonstrated that the cell performance of the modified anodes was stronglyinfluenced by the type of additives and the resultant properties. The V-I-Presults showed that electrical conductivity played a major role in the cell performance in H2. The cell with the Cu-modified anode exhibited the highest power density, followed by MgO, CaO, B, and LST modified anodes. Compared with metallic Cu, basic metal oxide exhibited low electrical conductivity, thus, leading to lower cell performance. Electrical conductivity investigated for various basic oxide modified Ni/SDC cermets followed an order of CaO>SrO> MgO >BaO> La2O3 [20]. On the contrary, in the current study, the MgO modified cell performed slightly better than the CaO modified one. This was probably because the comparison was made for different electrolytes (SDC vs. YSZ), and an inconsistent amount of dopant was used. Additionally, alkaline earth metal oxides such as CaO were reported to dissolve easily in the lattice of fluorite structures, thus, impeding the oxide ion conductivity of the anode. Therefore, the amount of loading needs optimization for different systems due to the diverse results reported in the literature [17,20].

Apart from Cu and basic metal oxides, the addition of B or LST to the anode showed no improvement in cell performance in H2. Boron has been shown promoting Ni-based catalysts for steam reforming of hydrocarbons; however, doping of boron precursors might incur a problem of poisoning or material incompatibility in the electrode [32]. The YSZ electrolyte is reported to react with volatile boron species above 600 °C to form YBO3, disintegrating the electrode structure. This explains the reason behind using the wet method to introduce boric acid rather than solid-state reaction adopted for other compounds studied in this work. In `fact, trials with the solid-state reaction using boric acid have been failed. Besides, the addition of LST also suffered from the material mismatch with the NiO/YSZ anode, although it was not very drastic. Moreover, the LSTpossesses low oxide ion conductivity and poor catalytic activity towardH2 oxidation due to large polarization resistance [33,34].

Despite the poor activity of 5 wt.% MgO, B, and LST modified anodes in H2, these modified cells performed better than their counterparts in CH4. The improved performance of the 5 wt.% MgO modified anode was attributed to increased electrochemical activity and coking tolerance of the Ni metal. Since CH4 exhibits higher reducing strength than H2, the anode (MgO-NiO) could be partially transformed to a metallic Ni phase (or NixMg1-xO) [35,36]. The Ni phase would then form a percolating layer on the YSZ electrolyte through the anode matrix and may improve the electrode conductivity. Besides, the Ni metal provides the active sites to dissociate CH4, thus, facilitating subsequent oxidation reaction. The presence of MgO altered the phase of Ni from metallic to cationic and made the anode reluctant to reduction as observed in the DRIFTs experiment, thereby alleviating deactivation of the Ni active site by coking. It was also noticed that a lot of carbon deposit was found around the MgO modified anode and near current collectors after thetest in comparison with the CaO modified one. The inclusion of CaO, a basic metal oxide, in the Ni-cermet anode has been demonstratedto reduce the deactivation in CH4 too. However, no such improvement was observed in the current study [20]. The likely reason was explained based on different preparation methods. The anode made by the wet impregnation might give a homogeneous distribution of precursors than that by the solid-state reaction. Furthermore, the amount of MgO in the anode was critical for cell performance since the addition of 5 wt.% MgO sustained the Ni cermet anode in CH4 while the one with 1 wt.% MgO was not effective. Nevertheless, high MgO content would give a poor performance in H2 due to a reduced electrical conductivity [19,36]. In contrast to the electronic promotion of MgO and boron, LST seemed to act as a structure promotor, and their additions greatly changed the morphologies of the Ni cermet anode, as shown in Figure 7. In the case of NiO/YSZ in combination with LST, a barrier layer was formed to cover the proximity of Ni cermet, thus, retarding the diffusion of CH4 and the succeeding activation. Slowing down the bond scission of methane would promote the oxidation of deposited carbon. Also, the effect of promotion was not evident in the composite anode of boron and Ni-cermet, possibly due to the material mismatch between boron species and YSZ electrolyte.

Click to view original image

Figure 7 SEM images of the surface of pristine and modified Ni cermet anodes before/after cell test in CH4.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we modified the surface of a Ni-cermet anode with copper, alkaline earth metal oxide, boron, and perovskite and investigated the cell performance in SOFCs. The results indicated that the copper modified anode gave the best performance in H2, while the one incorporated with inorganic compounds such as MgO, LST, and boron behaved relatively stable in CH4. The cell performance of the modified anodes was greatly affected by the interaction between the dopant and the Ni cermet, as well as the material compatibility with the substrate.The promotion of Ni-cermet anodes by MgO worked mainly via electronic interaction with Ni, while in LST and boron, it did through structure control. Meanwhile, the modification with CaO was not effective, probably due to the non-uniform distribution of precursors resulted from the solid-state reaction.Our studies provided valuable information to compare the effect of different dopants on the Ni anode and to obtain the underlying mechanism for coking resistance by an in situ surface analysis. This will allow designing an effective material capable of withstanding methane and other hydrocarbons for fuel cells and other potential energy-related applications.


The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Feng Chia University and from National Science Council of Taiwan under contract MOST 106-2218-E-035-009-MY2. The authors also gave the gratitude to lab colleagues, Mr. Willy C. Chen and Brian Y. Liao, for replotting the figures and preparing LST powders, respectively.

Author Contributions

Andrew C. Chien – Project management,experimental design,manuscript writing; Eric Y. Lin – Cell fabrication,electrical measurement,surface analysis; Nicole J. Ye – IR and MS analysis

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


  1. Bharadwaj SS, Schmidt LD. Catalytic partial oxidation of natural gas to syngas. Fuel Process Technol. 1995; 42: 109-127. [CrossRef]
  2. You HX, Abuliti A, Ding XW, Zhou YH. Reactions of low and middle concentration dry methane over Ni/YSZ anode of solid oxide fuel cell. J Power Sources. 2007; 165: 722-727. [CrossRef]
  3. Rismanchian A,Mirzababaei J, Chuang SS. Electroless plated Cu-Ni anode catalyst for natural gas solid oxide fuel cells. Catal Today. 2014; 245: 79-85. [CrossRef]
  4. Boldrin P, Ruiz-Trejo E, Mermelstein J, Menéndez JM, Reina TR, Brandon NP. Strategies for carbon and sulfur tolerant solid oxide fuel cell materials, incorporating lessons from heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Rev. 2016; 116: 13633-13684. [CrossRef]
  5. Shu LN, Sunarso J, Hashim SS, Mao JK, Zhou W, Liang FL. Advanced perovskite anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019; 44: 31275-31304. [CrossRef]
  6. Yue WX, Li YF,Zheng Y, Wu T, Zhao CH, Zhao J, et al. Enhancing coking resistance of Ni/YSZ electrodes: In situ characterization, mechanism research, and surface engineering. Nano Energy. 2019; 62: 64-78. [CrossRef]
  7. Jung I, Lee D, Lee SO, Kim D, Kim J, Hyun SH, et al. LSCM–YSZ nanocomposites for a high performance SOFC anode. Ceram Int. 2013; 39: 9753-9758. [CrossRef]
  8. Yang L, Wang SZ, Blinn K, Liu MF, Liu Z, Cheng Z, et al. Enhanced sulfur and coking tolerance of a mixed ion conductor for SOFCs: BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2-xYbxO3-δ. Science. 2009; 326: 126-129. [CrossRef]
  9. Huang YH,Dass RI, Xing ZL, Goodenough JB. Double perovskites as anode materials for solid-oxide fuel cells. Science. 2006; 312: 254-257. [CrossRef]
  10. Hao XM, Han DD, Wang JW, Liu YJ, Rooney D, Sun W, et al. Co-tape casting fabrication, field assistant sintering and evaluation of a coke resistant supported solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015; 40: 12790-12797. [CrossRef]
  11. Fisher JC, Chuang SS. Investigating the CH4 reaction pathway on a novel LSCF anode catalyst in the SOFC. Catal Commun. 2009; 10: 772-776. [CrossRef]
  12. Chien AC, Lin EY, Lai AD. Aid of a metallic functional layer on Ni/YSZ anode for direct methane fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45: 23526-23532. [CrossRef]
  13. Zhan ZL, Lin YB, Pillai M, Kim I, Barnett SA. High-rate electrochemical partial oxidation of methane in solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2006; 161: 460-465. [CrossRef]
  14. Wang W, Su C, Wu YZ, Ran R, Shao ZP. A comprehensive evaluation of a Ni-Al2O3 catalyst as a functional layer of solid-oxide fuel cell anode. J Power Sources. 2010; 195: 402-411. [CrossRef]
  15. Hua B, Li M, Luo JL, Pu J, Chi B, Li J. Carbon-resistant Ni-Zr0.92Y0.08O2-δ supported solid oxide fuel cells using Ni-Cu-Fe alloy cermet as on-cell reforming catalyst and mixed methane-steam as fuel. J Power Sources. 2016; 303: 340-346. [CrossRef]
  16. Wang ZQ, Wang ZB, Yang WQ, Peng RR, Lu YL. Carbon-tolerant solid oxide fuel cells using NiTiO3 as an anode internal reforming layer. J Power Sources. 2014; 255: 404-409. [CrossRef]
  17. Asamoto M, Miyake S, Sugihara K, Yahiro H. Improvement of Ni/SDC anode by alkaline earth metal oxide addition for direct methane-solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem Commun. 2009; 11: 1508-1511. [CrossRef]
  18. Yang L, Choi YM, Qin WT, Chen HY, Blinn K, Liu M, et al. Promotion of water-mediated carbon removal by nanostructured barium oxide/nickel interfaces in solid oxide fuel cells. Nat Commun. 2011; 2: 1-9. [CrossRef]
  19. Yang Q, Chai FT, Ma C, Sun CW, Shi SQ, Chen LQ. Enhanced coking tolerance of a MgO-modified Ni cermet anode for hydrocarbon fueled solid oxide fuel cells. J Mater Chem A. 2016; 4: 18031-18036. [CrossRef]
  20. Qu JF, Wang W, Chen YB, Deng X, Shao ZP. Stable direct-methane solid oxide fuel cells with calcium-oxide-modified nickel-based anodes operating at reduced temperatures. Appl Energy. 2016; 164: 563-571. [CrossRef]
  21. Han ZY, Yang YR, Kong DX. Surface-scale affinity and adsorption selectivity of alkaline earth metal oxides to H2O and CO2: Insight into SOFC anode modification. Appl Surf Sci. 2020; 503: 144333. [CrossRef]
  22. Li XX, Liu MF, Lai SY, Ding D, Gong MY, Lee JP, et al. In situ probing of the mechanisms of coking resistance on catalyst-modified anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Mater. 2015; 27: 822-828. [CrossRef]
  23. Takeguchi T, Kani Y, Yano T,Kikuchi R, Eguchi K,Tsujimoto K, et al. Study on steam reforming of CH4 and C2 hydrocarbons and carbon deposition on Ni-YSZ cermets. J Power Sources. 2002; 112: 588-595. [CrossRef]
  24. Chen L, Lu Y, Hong Q, Lin J, Dautzenberg FM. Catalytic partial oxidation of methane to syngas over Ca-decorated-Al2O3-supported Ni and NiB catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen. 2005; 292: 295-304. [CrossRef]
  25. Xu J,Saeys M. Improving the coking resistance of Ni-based catalysts by promotion with subsurface boron. J Catal. 2006; 242: 217-226. [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou XW, Yan N, Chuang KT, Luo JL. Progress in La-doped SrTiO3 (LST)-based anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 118-131. [CrossRef]
  27. Bu KK, Deng J, Zhang XY, Kuboon S, Yan TT, Li HR, et al. Promotional effects of B-terminated defective edges of Ni/boron nitride catalysts for coking- and sintering-resistant dry reforming of methane. Appl Catal B Environ. 2020; 267: 118692. [CrossRef]
  28. Chien AC, Van Bokhoven JA. Boron nitride coated rhodium black for stable production of syngas. Catal Sci Technol. 2015; 5: 3518-3524. [CrossRef]
  29. Singh S, Nguyen TD, Siang TJ, Phuong PT, Huy Phuc NH, Truong QD, et al. Boron-doped Ni/SBA-15 catalysts with enhanced coke resistance and catalytic performance for dry reforming of methane. J Energy Inst. 2020; 93: 31-42. [CrossRef]
  30. Neagu D, Irvine JT. Structure and properties of La0.4Sr0.4TiO3ceramics for use as anode materials in solid oxide fuel cells. Chem Mater. 2010; 22: 5042-5053. [CrossRef]
  31. Savaniu CD,Irvine JT. Reduction studies and evaluation of surface modified A-site deficient La-doped SrTiO3 as anode material for IT-SOFCs. 2009; 19: 8119-8128. [CrossRef]
  32. Chen K, Ai N, Jiang SP. Chemical compatibility between Boron oxides and electrolyte and cathode materials of solid oxide fuel cells. Fuel Cells. 2013; 13: 1101-1108. [CrossRef]
  33. Lee S, Kim J, Vohs JM,Gorte RJ.SOFC anodes based on infiltration of La0.3Sr0.7TiO3.J Electrochem Soc. 2008; 155: B1179. [CrossRef]
  34. Lee MJ, Shin JH,Ji MJ, Hwang HJ. Fabrication and electrochemical performance of nickel- and gadolinium-doped ceria-infiltrated La0.2Sr0.8TiO3 anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2018; 374: 181-187. [CrossRef]
  35. Liu Y, Bai YH, Liu J. (Ni0.75Fe0.25-xMgO)/YSZ anode for direct methane solid-oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2011; 196: 9965-9969. [CrossRef]
  36. Shiratori Y, Sasaki K. NiO-ScSZ and Ni0.9Mg0.1O-ScSZ-based anodes under internal dry reforming of simulated biogas mixtures. J Power Sources. 2008; 180: 738-741. [CrossRef]
Download PDF
0 0