Journal of Energy and Power Technology (JEPT) is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. This periodical is dedicated to providing a unique, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary platform for researchers, scientists and engineers in academia, research institutions, government agencies and industry. The journal is also of interest to technology developers, planners, policy makers and technical, economic and policy advisers to present their research results and findings.

Journal of Energy and Power Technology focuses on all aspects of energy and power. It publishes not only original research and review articles, but also various other types of articles from experts in these fields, such as Communication, Opinion, Comment, Conference Report, Technical Note, Book Review, and more, to promote intuitive understanding of the state-of-the-art and technology trends.

Main research areas include (but are not limited to):
Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) and grid connection impact
Energy harvesting devices
Energy storage
Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
Hydrogen energy 
Fuel cells
Nuclear energy
Energy economics and finance
Energy policy
Energy and environment
Energy conversion, conservation and management
Smart energy system

Power generation - Conventional and renewable
Power system management
Power transmission and distribution
Smart grid technologies
Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
Power electronic
Biofuels and alternatives
High voltage and pulse power
Organic and inorganic photovoltaics
Batteries and supercapacitors

Read more

Publication Speed (median values for papers published in 2024): Submission to First Decision: 6.6 weeks; Submission to Acceptance: 11.7 weeks; Acceptance to Publication: 7 days (1-2 days of FREE language polishing included)

Current Issue: 2025  Archive: 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019
Open Access Original Research

A Novel Approach to Carbon Monoxide Removal Using Transition Metal-Doped Boron Nitride Nanosensors for Environmental Sustainability

Fatemeh Mollaamin *

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey

Correspondence: Fatemeh Mollaamin

Academic Editor: Junkuo Gao

Received: November 12, 2024 | Accepted: March 27, 2025 | Published: April 02, 2025

Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2025, Volume 7, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/jept.2502006

Recommended citation: Mollaamin F. A Novel Approach to Carbon Monoxide Removal Using Transition Metal-Doped Boron Nitride Nanosensors for Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2025; 7(2): 006; doi:10.21926/jept.2502006.

© 2025 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract

Adsorption of toxic gas of CO molecules by using transition metals of X (X = Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn)-doped boron nitride nanocage (B5N10_NC) has been studied by computational chemistry. Based on NQR analysis, X-doped on B5N10_NC has shown the lowest fluctuation in electric potential and the highest negative atomic charge, including 0.2331 (copper), 0.3112 (cobalt), 0.5883 (chromium), 0.6853 (zinc), 0.6893 (vanadium) and 0.7499 coulomb (titanium), respectively, have presented the most tendency for being the electron acceptors. Moreover, the parameters of the NMR method have indicated that the yield of electron-accepting for doping atoms on the X–B4N10_NC through gas molecules adsorption can be ordered as Cu > Co >> Cr > Zn ≈ V > Ti that exhibits the strength of the covalent bond between titanium, vanadium, chromium, cobalt, copper, zinc, and CO towards toxic gas removal from air. The adsorption of CO gas molecules can remark spin polarization on the X–B4N10_NC, which specifies that these nano-surfaces may be employed as magnetic scavenging surfaces as a gas detector. Regarding IR spectroscopy, doped nanocages of Ti–B4N10_NC, V–B4N10_NC, Cr–B4N10_NC, Co–B4N10_NC, Cu–B4N10_NC and Zn–B4N10_NC, respectively, have the most fluctuations and the highest adsorption tendency for gas molecules which can direct specific inquiries on the individual impact of charge carriers (gas molecule-nanocage), as well as doping atoms on the overall structure. The Gibbs free energy has shown that the maximum efficiency of Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, and Zn atoms doping of B5N10_NC for gas molecules adsorption depends on the covalent bond between CO molecules and X–B4N10_NC as a potent sensor for air pollution removal. Therefore, for a given number of carbon donor sites in CO, the stabilities of complexes owing to doping atoms of Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn can be taken into account as: CO@Cu–B4N10_NC >> CO@Co–B4N10_NC > CO@Cr–B4N10_NC > CO@V–B4N10_NC > CO@Zn–B4N10_NC > CO@Ti–B4N10_NC.

Graphical abstract

Click to view original image

Keywords

CO removal; gas detecting; nanomaterials; transition metals; DFT

1. Introduction

The privileged attributes of boron nitrides, mainly structural and electronic, have made them proper for pollutant adsorption and semiconducting properties [1,2,3,4]. Boron nitride nanomaterials usually exhibit semi-leading behavior, which is considered an appropriate alternative to carbon nanotubes. The unique properties of boron and nitrogen atoms make boron nitride an interesting subject of numerous studies [5,6,7].

In recent years, different investigations on the adsorption of chemical contaminants and applying various boron nitride nanostructures as adsorbents for water purification have been studied [8,9,10].

Various physical shapes of boron nitride (BN)-based nano adsorbents such as nanoparticles, fullerenes, nanotubes, nanofibers, nanoribbons, nanosheets, nanomeshes, nanoflowers, and hollow spheres have been broadly considered possible adsorbents owing to their exceptional characteristics such as large surface area, structural variability, great chemical/mechanical strength, abundant structural defects, high reactive sites, and functional groups [11,12].

Carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide and methane are environmental problems. CO is a toxic gas that, at standard conditions, is tasteless, odorless, and colorless. It comes primarily from incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels. It is not irritating, and it is an asphyxiant. At high levels, it is deadly. The investigation of the adsorption of carbon monoxide on palladium and transition metals is an attractive research topic [13].

The researchers have applied Density functional theory for the computation of geometry optimizations, binding and adsorption energies, and electronic properties of CO molecule adsorption on pristine and group 8B transition metal (TM)–doped boron nitride nanosheets (BNNS). They exhibited that the TM atom displays strong binding with B and N vacancy BNNSs with energy gaps of TM–doped BNNS smaller than that of pristine BNNS. The CO tends to attach via its C and O atoms to TM–doped BNNSs with more considerable adsorption energy and smaller adsorption distance than that of pristine BNNS [14].

The interactions between carbon monoxide gas and boron nitride nanocage were investigated using two DFT functionals (B3LYP and B97D) and a 6-31G(d) basis set. The computational results indicated the capability of B12N12 as a sensor for potential applications in the detection of CO under an external electric field [15,16].

2. Materials and Methods

This research article wants to remove toxic gas molecules, including CO, from the air through an eco-friendly approach by using (Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn)-doped B5N10_NC (Figure 1).

Click to view original image

Figure 1 Application of X–B4N10_NC towards adsorption of gas molecules of CO and formation of complexes: "CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, CO@Zn–B4N10_NC" complexes.

Boron nitride nanocage has been designed owing to doping atoms of titanium, vanadium, chromium, cobalt, copper, and zinc which can increase the gas sensing potential of BN-nanocage.

Figure 1 has declared the status of CO adsorption on the X–B4N10_NC surface which towards formation of complexes containing CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, CO@Zn–B4N10_NC by computational chemistry.

The charge distribution of the mentioned complexes is calculated due to the Bader charge analysis [17]. The trapping of CO molecules by X–B4N10_NC (X = Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn) was successfully incorporated due to binding formation consisting of C Ti, C V, C Cr, C Co, C Cu, C Zn (Figure 1).

Development of the applied Density Functional Theory (DFT) methodology only became notable after W. Kohn and L. J. Sham released their reputable series of equations which are introduced as Kohn-Sham (KS) equations [18,19,20,21,22,23]. So, one starts with a reference model of M with non-interacting electrons related to the external potential $v_{s}$ and with Hamiltonian [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]:

By representing the single particle orbitals $\psi_{i}$ all electronic densities physically acceptable for the system of "non-interacting" electrons are written in the equation (2):

Finally, the total energy could be measured by the KS method due to the equation (3):

In this article, the rigid PES using DFT calculations has been computed applying Gaussian 16 revision C.01 software [32]. The input Z-matrix for adsorption of CO molecules in air by the X–B4N10_NC has been designed with GaussView 6.1 [33] using 6–311+G (d,p), EPR–3, LANL2DZ basis set.

3. Results and Discussion

Electric field gradient (EFG) at the citation of the nucleus in CO is allocated by the valence electrons twisted in the attachment with close nuclei of X–B4N10_NC (X = Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn) (Figure 2). So, "the nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) frequency" can be measured for CO@X–B4N10_NC complexes using Gaussian 16 revision C.01 software [32] (Table 1 & Table 2).

Click to view original image

Figure 2 Carbon monoxide adsorbed on the surface of X–B4N10_NC (X = Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn) towards the formation of a) CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, b) CO@V–B4N10_NC, c) CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, d) CO@Co–B4N10_NC, e) CO@Cu–B4N10_NC and f) CO@Zn–B4N10_NC.

Table 1 The electric potential (a.u.) and Bader charge (e) through NQR calculation for CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC complexes.

Table 2 The electric potential (a.u.) and Bader charge (e) through NQR calculation for CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes.

The NQR method is related to the multipole expansion in Cartesian coordinates as the equation (4) [34,35]:

After that, a simplification on the equation (4), there are only the second derivatives related to the identical variable for the potential energy [34,35]:

There are two parameters which must be gotten from NQR experiments: the quadrupole coupling constant, $\chi$, and asymmetry parameter of the EFG tensor η:

η

where $q_{ii}$ are ingredients of the EFG tensor at the quadrupole nucleus determined in the EFG principal axes system, $Q$ is the nuclear quadrupole moment, $e$ is the proton charge and $h$ is the Planck's constant [36,37].

In this research work, the electric potential as the quantity of work energy through carrying over the electric charge from one position to another position in the essence of electric field has been evaluated for "CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC" complexes (Table 1 & Table 2).

Doping atoms of Ti(15), V(15), Cr(15), Co(15), Cu(15), Zn(15) on the B5N10_NC have shown the most potential for accepting the electron from the electron donor of C(1) and O(2) in CO adsorbed on the X–B4N10_NC (Figure 3).

Click to view original image

Figure 3 "Electric potential (a.u.) versus Bader charge (coulomb)" for a) CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, b) CO@V–B4N10_NC, c) CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, d) CO@Co–B4N10_NC, e) CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and f) CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes.

In Figure 3(a) and (b), it was observed the behavior of CO adsorption on the Ti–B4N10_NC and CO@V–B4N10_NC, with the analogous high sensitivity based on the relation coefficient of R2 = 0.986 and R2 = 0.9323, respectively. Adsorption of CO on the Cr–B4N10_NC, Co–B4N10_NC and Cu–B4N10_NC in Figure 3(c), (d) and (e), respectively, has illustrated the highest sensing of R2 = 0.9666, and R2 = 0.9679 (both Co–B4N10_NC and Cu–B4N10_NC). However, Figure 3(f) has resulted that CO@Zn–B4N10_NC has a lower potential than other nanocage surfaces for CO removal from air (R2 = 0.687). The adsorbents of chromium with 0.5883, zinc with 0.6853, vanadium with 0.6893, and titanium with 0.7499 coulomb, respectively, have presented the most tendency for being the electron acceptors. The uptake of gas molecules has been known to be associated with X–B4N10_NC, indicating that the adsorbed CO molecules in the X–X-doped nanocage can be internalized through a different pathway from pristine nanocage.

The chemical shielding resulted from NMR [38] spectroscopy including isotropic (σiso) and anisotropic (σaniso) for gas molecules trapped in the X–B4N10_NC towards the formation of CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes have been computed by Gaussian 16 revision C.01 program package [30] and been shown in Table 3 & Table 4.

Table 3 NMR tensors (ppm) for selected atoms of CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, and CO@Co–B4N10_NC complexes.

Table 4 NMR tensors (ppm) for selected atoms of CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes.

NMR parameter (ppm) has reported the notable amounts for CO which were adsorbed on the X–B4N10_NC (Table 3 & Table 4). The increase in the NMR anisotropy spans for C(1) and O(2) atoms of CO adsorption on the X–B4N10_NC. Notably, doping of Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, and Zn on B4N10_NC might promote the strength of nanocage. The adsorption of CO can present spin polarization on the X–B4N10_NC which indicates that these nano-surfaces may be employed as magnetic scavenging surfaces as a gas detector.

Figure 4(a-f) indicates the similar orientation of NMR parameter (ppm) for boron and nitrogen; however, a remarkable deviation is observed from doping atoms of Ti(15), V(15), Cr(15), Co(15), Cu(15), Zn(15) through interaction with C(1) and O(2) of CO during adsorbing on the B5N10_NC.

Click to view original image

Figure 4 NMR tensors (ppm) for a) CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, b) CO@V–B4N10_NC, c) CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, d) CO@Co–B4N10_NC, e) CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and f) CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes using CAM–B3LYP–D3/6-311+G (d,p), LANL2DZ.

In Figure 4(a-f), gas molecules of CO in the complexes of CO@Ti–B4N10_NC (Figure 4a), CO@V–B4N10_NC (Figure 4b), CO@Cr–B4N10_NC (Figure 4c), CO@Co–B4N10_NC (Figure 4d), CO@Cu–B4N10_NC (Figure 4e), and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC (Figure 4f) exhibit the alteration in the NMR parameter among gas grabbing.

The IR calculations have been done for the adsorption of CO molecules by X–B4N10_NC during toxic gas sensing in air. Therefore, it has been simulated the several clusters containing CO@Ti–B4N10_NC (Figure 5a), CO@V–B4N10_NC (Figure 5b), CO@Cr–B4N10_NC (Figure 5c), CO@Co–B4N10_NC (Figure 5d), CO@Cu–B4N10_NC (Figure 5e) and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC (Figure 5f) complexes.

Click to view original image

Figure 5 IR spectra for a) CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, b) CO@V–B4N10_NC, c) CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, d) CO@Co–B4N10_NC, e) CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and f) CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes.

The graph of Figure 5(a) has been observed in the frequency range between 100–1100 cm-1 for CO@Ti–B4N10_NC with sharp peaks around 202.69, 606.23 and 858.53 cm-1. Figure 5(b) has shown the frequency range between 100–1100 cm-1 for CO@V–B4N10_NC with two sharp peaks around 369.36, 422.65 and 603.26 cm-1. Figure 5(c) has indicated the fluctuation of frequency between 100–1100 cm-1 for CO@Cr–B4N10_NC with several sharp peaks around 328.93, 433.18 and 554.91 cm-1. Figure 5(d) has shown the fluctuation of frequency between 100–1100 cm-1 for CO@Co–B4N10_NC with sharp peaks around 180.91, 211.68, 370.94, 403.62, 545.15, and 642.16 cm-1. Moreover, it has been observed that the frequency between 200–1100 for CO@Cu–B4N10_NC with sharp peaks around 357.09, 581.27 and 673.35 cm-1 (Figure 5e). Besides, Figure 5(f) has exhibited the frequency between 200–1100 for CO@Zn–B4N10_NC with sharp peaks around 264.84, 563.65 and 769.01cm-1.

Thermodynamic specifications have been concluded that X–B4N10_NC due to adsorption of CO might be more efficient sensors for detecting and removing the gas molecules from the polluted air (Table 5).

Table 5 The thermodynamic characters of CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes using CAM–B3LYP–D3/6–311+G (d,p), LANL2DZ calculation.

It has been indicated that for a given number of carbon donor sites in CO, the stabilities of complexes owing to doping atoms of Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn can be considered as: CO@Cu–B4N10_NC >> CO@Co–B4N10_NC > CO@Cr–B4N10_NC > CO@V–B4N10_NC > CO@Zn–B4N10_NC > CO@Ti–B4N10_NC (Table 5).

The adsorption process of CO gas molecules on the X–B4N10_NC is affirmed by the $\Delta \mathrm{G°}_{\mathrm{ads}}$ quantities:

Figure 6 has shown that the key role of doped atoms of Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, Zn during interaction between the adsorbates of CO gas molecules as the electron donors and the adsorbent of Ti–B4N10_NC, V–B4N10_NC, Cr–B4N10_NC, Co–B4N10_NC, Cu–B4N10_NC, and Zn–B4N10_NC as electron acceptors. Therefore, the selectivity of atom-doped on boron nitride nanocage (gas sensor) for gas molecules adsorption can be resulted as: Cu >> Co > Cr > V > Zn > Ti (Table 5 & Figure 6).

Click to view original image

Figure 6 The Gibbs free energy ($\Delta \mathrm{G°}_{\mathrm{ads}}$) versus dipole moment (Debye) for CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, CO@V–B4N10_NC, CO@Cr–B4N10_NC, CO@Co–B4N10_NC, CO@Cu–B4N10_NC, and CO@Zn–B4N10_NC complexes.

A strong donor–acceptor interaction between CO and TM–doped B4N10_NC has been probed. The orbital distribution analysis shows that electrons are delocalized around the adsorption site. Energy gaps and density of states of TM–doped B4N10_NC are significantly changed after CO adsorption, corresponding to the significant change of electrical conductivity of TM–doped BNNSs. In conclusion, TM–doped B4N10_NC are strongly reactive and sensitive to CO molecule and therefore it can be used as adsorption and sensing nanomaterials.

4. Conclusion

Various industries utilize gas sensors for environmental monitoring. The advantage of the gas sensors is limited due to the low sensitivity of sensing nanomaterial produced from pristine structures. The functionalization of pristine nanomaterial leads to enhanced adsorption reactivity and improvement of sensitivity. Many theoretical studies suggest that the functionalization by impurity atom doping in nanomaterial can enhance chemical reactivity. This research has investigated the doping of Ti, V, Cr, Co, Cu, and Zn transition metals in the boron nitride nanocage (X–B4N10_NC) for enhancing toxic gas sensing of these nanomaterials in air pollution removal. Therefore, CO gas molecule separation involving X–B4N10_NC has been experimentally investigated based on electrostatic interactions between the gas molecules and X–B4N10_NC. The electromagnetic and thermodynamic properties of X–B4N10_NC complexes were computed using the DFT method. The data has demonstrated that the chosen gas molecules adsorbed on the X–B4N10_NC are relatively stable, with the most stable adsorption site being in the center of the X–B4N10_NC system. The selectivity of atom-doped on boron nitride nanocages (gas sensor) for gas molecule adsorption can be as follows: CO@Cu–B4N10_NC > CO@Co–B4N10_NC > CO@Cr–B4N10_NC > CO@V–B4N10_NC > CO@Zn–B4N10_NC > CO@Ti–B4N10_NC, respectively.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Kastamonu University for completing this paper and its research.

Author Contributions

Fatemeh Mollaamin (F.M.): Conceptualization, writing – original draft, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. The author has read and approved the published version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The author states the topic selection, innovations and methods, etc. of this study are not duplicated in authors’ published articles.

References

  1. Gonzalez-Ortiz D, Salameh C, Bechelany M, Miele P. Nanostructured boron nitride–based materials: Synthesis and applications. Mater Today Adv. 2020; 8: 100107. [CrossRef]
  2. Mishra NS, Saravanan P. A review on the synergistic features of hexagonal boron nitride (white graphene) as adsorbent-photo active nanomaterial. ChemistrySelect. 2018; 3: 8023-8034. [CrossRef]
  3. Weng Q, Wang X, Wang X, Bando Y, Golberg D. Functionalized hexagonal boron nitride nanomaterials: Emerging properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2016; 45: 3989-4012. [CrossRef]
  4. Muñoz AD, Escobedo-Morales A, Skakerzadeh E, Anota EC. Effect of homonuclear boron bonds in the adsorption of DNA nucleobases on boron nitride nanosheets. J Mol Liq. 2021; 322: 114951. [CrossRef]
  5. Shtansky DV, Matveev AT, Permyakova ES, Leybo DV, Konopatsky AS, Sorokin PB. Recent progress in fabrication and application of BN nanostructures and BN-based nanohybrids. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12: 2810. [CrossRef]
  6. Yang Y, Peng Y, Saleem MF, Chen Z, Sun W. Hexagonal boron nitride on III-V compounds: A review of the synthesis and applications. Materials. 2022; 15: 4396. [CrossRef]
  7. Davies A, Albar JD, Summerfield A, Thomas JC, Cheng TS, Korolkov VV, et al. Lattice-matched epitaxial graphene grown on boron nitride. Nano Lett. 2018; 18: 498-504. [CrossRef]
  8. Bangari RS, Yadav VK, Singh JK, Sinha N. Fe3O4-Functionalized boron nitride nanosheets as novel adsorbents for removal of arsenic (III) from contaminated water. ACS Omega. 2020; 5: 10301-10314. [CrossRef]
  9. Chao Y, Zhang J, Li H, Wu P, Li X, Chang H, et al. Synthesis of boron nitride nanosheets with N-defects for efficient tetracycline antibiotics adsorptive removal. Chem Eng J. 2020; 387: 124138. [CrossRef]
  10. Vatanpour V, Naziri Mehrabani SA, Keskin B, Arabi N, Zeytuncu B, Koyuncu I. A comprehensive review on the applications of boron nitride nanomaterials in membrane fabrication and modification. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2021; 60: 13391-13424. [CrossRef]
  11. Larki S, Shakerzadeh E, Anota EC, Behjatmanesh-Ardakani R. The Al, Ga and Sc dopants effect on the adsorption performance of B12N12 nanocluster toward pnictogen hydrides. Chem Phys. 2019; 526: 110424. [CrossRef]
  12. Guo Y, Wang R, Wang P, Rao L, Wang C. Developing a novel layered boron nitride–carbon nitride composite with high efficiency and selectivity to remove protonated dyes from water. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019; 7: 5727-5741. [CrossRef]
  13. Carrillo I, Ramírez JM, Magaña LF. Adsorption of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and methane on hexagonal boron nitride with high titanium coverage. Surf Sci. 2015; 637: 48-52. [CrossRef]
  14. Tabtimsai C, Rakrai W, Kaewtong C, Wanno B. CO gas adsorption and detection ability of boron nitride nanosheet doping with group 8B transition metal: A theoretical investigation. Diam Relat Mater. 2023; 133: 109694. [CrossRef]
  15. Silva AL, de Jesus Gomes Varela Júnior J. Carbon monoxide interaction with B12N12 nanocage with and without an external electric field: A DFT study. J Nanoparticle Res. 2022; 24: 1. [CrossRef]
  16. Ammar HY, Badran HM, Eid KM. TM-doped B12N12 nano-cage (TM = Mn, Fe) as a sensor for CO, NO, and NH3 gases: A DFT and TD-DFT study. Mater Today Commun. 2020; 25: 101681. [CrossRef]
  17. Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A, Jónsson H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput Mater Sci. 2006; 36: 354-360. [CrossRef]
  18. Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B. 1994; 50: 17953-17979. [CrossRef]
  19. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1996; 77: 3865. [CrossRef]
  20. Ziesche P, Kurth S, Perdew JP. Density functionals from LDA to GGA. Comput Mater Sci. 1998; 11: 122-127. [CrossRef]
  21. Arrigoni M, Madsen GK. Comparing the performance of LDA and GGA functionals in predicting the lattice thermal conductivity of III-V semiconductor materials in the zincblende structure: The cases of AlAs and BAs. Comput Mater Sci. 2019; 156: 354-360. [CrossRef]
  22. Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev. 1964; 136: B864-B871. [CrossRef]
  23. Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev. 1965; 140: A1133-A1138. [CrossRef]
  24. Becke AD. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys. 1993; 98: 5648-5652. [CrossRef]
  25. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B. 1988; 37: 785-789. [CrossRef]
  26. Kim K, Jordan KD. Comparison of density functional and MP2 calculations on the water monomer and dimer. J Phys Chem. 1994; 98: 10089-10094. [CrossRef]
  27. Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J Phys Chem. 1994; 98: 11623-11627. [CrossRef]
  28. Cramer CJ. Essentials of computational chemistry: Theories and models. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
  29. Mollaamin F, Monajjemi M. Corrosion inhibiting by some organic heterocyclic inhibitors through Langmuir adsorption mechanism on the Al-X (X = Mg/Ga/Si) alloy surface: A study of quantum three-layer method of CAM-DFT/ONIOM. Journal of Bio Tribo Corros. 2023; 9: 33. [CrossRef]
  30. Mollaamin F, Monajjemi M. Molecular modelling framework of metal-organic clusters for conserving surfaces: Langmuir sorption through the TD-DFT/ONIOM approach. Mol Simul. 2023; 49: 365-376. [CrossRef]
  31. Vosko SH, Wilk L, Nusair M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: A critical analysis. Can J Phys. 1980; 58: 1200-1211. [CrossRef]
  32. Frisch ME, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb M, Cheeseman JR, et al. Gaussian 16. Revision C.01. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc.; 2016.
  33. Dennington RD, Keith TA, Millam JM. GaussView, version 6.06.16. Shawnee Mission, KS: Semichem Inc.; 2016.
  34. Smith JA. Nuclear quadrupole resonance spectroscopy. General principles. J Chem Educ. 1971; 48: 39-41. [CrossRef]
  35. Garroway AN. Appendix K: Nuclear quadrupole resonance. Alternatives for Landmine Detection. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 2003; Report MR-1608.
  36. Poleshchuk OK, Kalinina EL, Latosińska JN, Koput J. Application of density functional theory to the analysis of electronic structure and quadrupole interaction in dimers of transition and non-transition elements. J Mol Struct Theochem. 2001; 574: 233-243. [CrossRef]
  37. Young HD, Freedman RA. Sears and Zemansky's University Physics with Modern Physics. 13th ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 2012.
  38. Sohail U, Ullah F, Binti Zainal Arfan NH, Abdul Hamid MH, Mahmood T, Sheikh NS, et al. Transition metal sensing with nitrogenated holey graphene: A first-principles investigation. Molecules. 2023; 28: 4060. [CrossRef]
Newsletter
Download PDF Download Citation
 14  56