OBM Transplantation (ISSN 2577-5820) is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc., which covers all evidence-based scientific studies related to transplantation, including: transplantation procedures and the maintenance of transplanted tissues or organs; assimilation of grafted tissue and the reconstitution of removed organs or parts of organs; transplantation of heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreatic islets and bone marrow, etc. Areas related to clinical and experimental transplantation are also of interest.

OBM Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication, and we aim at serving the international transplant community with high accessibility as well as relevant and high quality content.

The journal publishes all types of articles in English. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. We encourage authors to be concise but present their results in as much detail as necessary, as reviewers are expected to emphasize scientific rigor and reproducibility.

Publication Speed (median values for papers published in 2023): Submission to First Decision: 6.7 weeks; Submission to Acceptance: 14.4 weeks; Acceptance to Publication: 6 days (1-2 days of FREE language polishing included)

Current Issue: 2024  Archive: 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Open Access Review

Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Solid Organ Transplantation

Sravanthi Nandavaram 1, *, Hannah Twist 2, Rickey Evans 2, Sravanthi Paluri 3, Ana Castellanos 3, Andres Pelaez 4

  1. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA

  2. Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, KY, USA

  3. Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, KY, USA

  4. Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida, USA

Correspondence: Sravanthi Nandavaram

Academic Editor: Ashwini Arjuna

Special Issue: Lung Transplantation

Received: January 31, 2024 | Accepted: April 08, 2024 | Published: April 10, 2024

OBM Transplantation 2024, Volume 8, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/obm.transplant.2402211

Recommended citation: Nandavaram S, Twist H, Evans R, Paluri S, Castellanos A, Pelaez A. Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Solid Organ Transplantation. OBM Transplantation 2024; 8(2): 211; doi:10.21926/obm.transplant.2402211.

© 2024 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) is a syndrome characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and thrombocytopenia. The presence of schistocytes on peripheral smear, a negative Coombs test, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, increased reticulocyte count and low haptoglobin are often the clues for MAHA. The microvascular process often targets vasculature in kidneys, brain, gastrointestinal system, heart, and skin. A timely diagnosis and treatment are often crucial to prevent severe end organ damage and death. TMA is classified into primary and secondary forms. Primary TMA includes TTP and complement mediated or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), often related to a mutation or deficiency and clinically expressed in the setting of a precipitant condition. Secondary TMA is a manifestation of underlying disorder and can occur in clinical scenarios associated with autoimmune disease, malignancy, infections, SOT (Solid Organ Transplant), pregnancy, HSCT (Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation), medications, or methylmalonic acidemia. Transplant associated TMA (TA-TMA) can be complement mediated or aHUS and could be related to the ischemic reperfusion injury, induction regimen, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use, mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) inhibitor use, or could be infection related. Cost, access, and turnaround time are often the limitations for certain TTP and complement specific testing. Treatment should not be delayed while waiting for such tests. Treatment must be individualized based on the underlying cause of TMA. Terminal complement blockade utilizing monoclonal antibodies directed against C5 complement is the treatment for complement mediated TMA. C5 inhibitors have also been used successfully in treatment of secondary HUS cases where, unlike aHUS, defects in complement cannot be demonstrated. Such treatment has demonstrated improvement in renal function, MAHA and platelet counts.


Schistocytes; thrombotic microangiopathy; hemolytic uremic syndrome

1. Introduction

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is characterized by non-immune intravascular hemolysis and ischemic organ dysfunction. Clinical presentation is often variable, non-specific and depends on the etiological cause and the organ affected. TMA often targets the microvasculature in kidneys, brain, gastrointestinal system, heart, and skin [1,2]. It is crucial to diagnose and initiate treatment in a timely fashion to prevent severe end organ injury and death.

TMA post lung transplantation is under reported compared to TMA post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or renal transplant.

2. Incidence, Epidemiology and Types

TMA is to be suspected if there is evidence of thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA). The presence of schistocytes on peripheral smear, negative Coombs test, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, increased reticulocyte count and low haptoglobin are often the clues for MAHA [2]. Though schistocytes are supportive of the diagnosis, lack of them does not rule out the diagnosis, especially when there is a clinical suspicion or other findings are present. TMA is a continuum process and schistocytes might not always be present on initial evaluation and may need frequent assessment [3].

TMA is classified into primary and secondary forms. The onset of TMA syndromes can be sudden or gradual. Despite being so diverse, TMA syndromes have common clinical and pathological features. Clinical features being the triad of MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and end organ injury while the pathological features include endothelial damage, fibrin thrombi generation and microvasculature damage [4,5]. The degree of thrombocytopenia may vary based on the pathophysiological process. In TTP, platelet rich microthrombi predominate and the median platelet count is <20,000. In HUS, fibrin-rich microthrombi predominate and platelet counts are either <150,000 OR at least a 25% decrease from baseline.

Primary TMA includes thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and complement mediated or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), often related to a mutation or deficiency and clinically expressed in the setting of a precipitant condition. From a clinical standpoint, TTP often affects the brain and GI system and rarely causes acute kidney injury (AKI). Severe AKI is prominent in HUS or complement mediated TMA [4,5,6].

Secondary TMA is a manifestation of underlying disorder and can occur in clinical scenarios associated with autoimmune disease, malignancy, infections, Solid Organ Transplant (SOT), pregnancy, HSCT, medications, or methylmalonic acidemia [4,5,6].

2.1 Primary TMA

2.1.1 TTP

TTP is a rare and fatal condition. The incidence of TTP is 2-6 per million persons [7,8]. TTP can be hereditary or acquired and is characterized by deficiency of ADAMTS-13. Hereditary TTP (Upshaw-Schulman Syndrome) is caused by ADAMTS13 mutations [4]. Acquired TTP, an autoimmune disorder, is caused by inhibition of ADAMTS13 activity by autoantibodies [5,9]. Deficiency of ADAMTS-13 results in large von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers which increase the risk for platelet aggregation and thrombi generation in the small vasculature. The vast majority of TTP cases are acquired or immune.

Diagnosis of TTP and cause can be achieved by measuring the levels of ADAMTS-13 activity, ADAMTS-13 Ag, and inhibitors. A plasma level of <10 IU/dL ADAMTS-13 activity confirms the TTP diagnosis. Extremely low or absent ADAMTS-13 Ag can be seen in hereditary TTP, which is a rare autosomal recessive condition [10,11,12]. The presence of autoantibodies against ADAMTS-13 can point towards the diagnosis of autoimmune or acquired TTP. These auto antibodies, usually IgG, play a role either by causing rapid clearance of ADAMTS-13 or by interfering with the VWF recognition [13].

While interpreting the ADAMTS 13 activity, it is important to acknowledge that these levels can be reduced, however greater than 10 IU/dL in other conditions such as pregnancy, severe sepsis, DIC, metastatic malignancy, SLE, severe liver dysfunction, aHUS and Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli HUS (Stx E. coli HUS; STEC-HUS) [14,15].

2.1.2 Atypical HUS/Complement Mediated TMA

Diagnosis of atypical HUS is often made on exclusion of all other forms of TMA. It is the result of dysregulation and uncontrolled activation of the alternate complement pathway. Presence of complement factor H antibodies (5-10% aHUS cases) or complement mutations can activate the terminal phase of complement pathway and membrane attack complex formation thereby resulting in extensive endothelial cell damage, platelet aggregations and microthrombi generation [5,16,17].

Assessment of soluble C5b-9 levels, complement regulatory factors such as CFH (Complement Factor H), complement factor I; MCP, membrane cofactor protein; C3, complement component C3; CFB, complement factor B can aid in the diagnosis of aHUS [18,19].

Hereditary complement mediated TMA is a result of regulatory gene (CFH, CFI, CD46) or effector gene (CFB, C3) mutations [4]. Acquired form of complement mediated TMA can result from a deficiency in complement factor H secondary to antibodies to the complement (10% of cases) [20,21].

2.1.3 Shiga Toxin Mediated HUS

Shiga toxin mediated HUS is often an infection related more commonly with Shiga toxin producing bacteria, especially E. coli serotype O157:H7. Other potential infectious culprits include S. pneumoniae and Shigella. Bacterial cytotoxins can damage the vascular endothelial cells, RBC’s and platelets, which in turn can amplify the complement activation. Patients can present with symptoms of severe abdominal pain or bloody diarrhea [22,23].

Diagnosis of the infection and appropriate treatment is crucial to decrease the cytotoxin production and culminate the exaggerated complement activation process. Stool testing can aid in the identification of the Shiga toxin, especially in the acute colitis phase [24].

2.2 Secondary TMA

2.2.1 Transplant Associated TMA

TMA has been reported after solid organ transplantation, however the reported incidence has been variable given the lack of consensus on the diagnosis of transplant associated TMA (TA-TMA) [25]. TA-TMA can be complement mediated or aHUS type and could be related to the ischemic reperfusion injury, induction regimen, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use, mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) inhibitor use, or could be infection related. TMA in transplant setting can occur as a de novo event or as a recurrent disease. Recurrent disease can be seen in patients with genetic aberrations of complement system [26]. TA-TMA can occur in early post operative period or later. An accurate diagnosis can be challenging in post operative state and can be confounded by factors such as ischemic reperfusion insult, post operative hemodynamics, and sepsis. The clinical spectrum of TA-TMA can range from a limited disease, chronic organ dysfunction or systemic TMA with multi organ dysfunction. TMA after lung transplantation could be a result of atypical HUS or secondary factors such as CNI use and opportunistic infections. Systemic TMA is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality [27].

The pathogenesis of TMA post transplantation remains poorly understood. However, different mechanisms have been speculated including acquired deficiency of ADAMTS13 either in a post operative state or in the presence of inhibitor antibodies [28]. Neutrophil activation and neutrophil extracellular traps released from endothelial injury has been described, that can result in complement activation, complement factor P and C5b-9 deposition [29,30,31]. Acquisition of donor complement regulatory proteins appeared to increase the risk of TA-TMA [32]. Also, an association of HLA-DRB1*11 and TTP has been reported [33].

A multiple hit theory has been proposed in HSCT literature with the preexisting host factors such as underlying predisposition for complement activation or preexisting endothelial injury being the initial hit, conditioning regimen or ischemic reperfusion injury and subsequent endothelial cell activation being the second hit, and finally the alloreactivity or medication or infections being the third hit, eventually triggering the complement cascade activation [34]. Complement activation can be confirmed by significant elevations in C3b and C5b-9 [35]. Diagnosis and treatment of TA-TMA is crucial to stop the dysregulation process and halt the end organ damage [36,37].

TA-TMA could also be related to acquired deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity. Metivier and colleagues assessed ADAMTS13 activity in lung transplant recipients with suspected TMA. 3 out of 8 patients had extremely low ADAMTS13 activity (<5%) while the remaining had low but detectable levels [38].

Hachem and colleagues reported an incidence of 3.8 cases per 100 years in their retrospective review of 262 lung transplants between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2003. The median onset of TMA was 265 days, with as early as 17 days and as late as 4 years post transplantation. 11 out of 24 instances were isolated TMA while the rest of them occurred in the setting of other illnesses such as pneumonia, graft dysfunction, CMV infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. They noted a higher incidence of TMA with the combination of CNI and sirolimus. Female gender, history of TMA and immunosuppressive regimen were noted to be the significant predictors of TMA [39].

Fortin et al reported that the immunosuppressive combination of cyclosporine and sirolimus has both pro-necrotic and anti-inflammatory effects on the endothelial cells [40]. There have been reports of TMA in the setting of infections in lung transplant recipients [41].

2.2.2 Drug Induced

Drug induced TMA (DITMA) can be immune mediated or nonimmune mediated, dose dependent direct endothelial cell damage [42] (Table 1).

Table 1 Potential Drug-Induced Causes of TMA.

Immune Mediated Mechanism: Quinine was the first drug to be implicated in the development of drug dependent antibodies binding to multiple cell antigens and endothelial cell activation [43,44]. Subsequently quetiapine and gemcitabine were reported to be associated with acute episodes of TMA on repetitive exposure [45,46]. Such immune mediate reaction is related to the structural elements of the drugs complementary to the epitope and the antibody [47].

Dose dependent mechanism: Drugs such as immunosuppressants, chemotherapeutic agents and VEGF inhibitors in a dose dependent fashion can cause endothelial dysfunction, prostacyclin inhibition, platelet aggregation thereby resulting in TMA [48,49].

DITMA pathophysiology depends on the offending drug. Mitomycin, gemcitabine, interferon, quinolones are implicated in direct endothelial damage and pro thrombotic activation. Anti VEGF monoclonal drugs such as bevacizumab and tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib and pazopanib interfere with VEGF pathway signal protein and receptor affecting the homeostasis of endothelial podocyte complex in the kidney. Carfilzomib can cause decreased CFH expression and thereby result in complement mediated TMA. Downregulation of transcription factor such as NF-KB, by agents such as calcineurin inhibitors can create a prothrombotic state, augment the oxidative stress, decrease nitric oxide concentration and VEGF production and can result in TMA [50].

2.2.3 Infections

Several infectious agents have been implicated in secondary TMA (Table 2). TMA has been reported in HIV infections [51]. Though the exact mechanism is unclear, there has been speculations that TMA could be a result of primary endothelial injury from the virus while some reports suggest ADAMTS 13 deficiency [52,53]. There have been reports of TMA association with viral Infections such as adenovirus, BK virus, CMV, HHV6, parvovirus B19 and fungal infections such as aspergillus [54,55]. aHUS can be triggered by SARS-CoV-2, could be a result of direct toxic effect on endothelial cells or complement activation [56]. Based on the clinical presentation and suspicious agent, appropriate testing should be deployed for accurate diagnosis and treatment of the infectious agent.

Table 2 Infections.

2.2.4 Pregnancy

TTP can occur or relapse during the first trimester of pregnancy [57]. HELLP Syndrome often associated with pre-eclampsia is characterized by MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and liver damage [58]. The onset of aHUS in immediate post-partum phase is related to the loss of complement regulators present on placental surface [59,60].

2.2.5 Malignancy

TMA in the setting of malignancy could be related to cancer itself or could be secondary to chemotherapy. Metastatic cancer cells can cause microvascular obstruction and injury. Chemotherapy related TMA can be either from non-immune mediated dose dependent cytotoxicity or from immune mediated mechanism with development of drug dependent antibodies [61].

2.2.6 Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune disorders such as SLE and systemic scleroderma are associated with TMA. Diagnosis of such autoimmune conditions requires the need for extensive autoimmune panel testing [62].

2.2.7 Malignant Hypertension

Malignant hypertension can trigger an aHUS. TMA in the setting of malignant hypertension is related to direct endothelial injury. These patients can have ocular signs of hypertensive retinopathy [2,5]. aHUS can be accompanied by malignant hypertension.

2.2.8 Methylmalonic Acidemia

Cobalamin C disease (hereditary metabolic disorders of vitamin B12), result of mutations of gene encoding the methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type C protein, can result in methylcobalamin deficiency resulting in hyperhomocystinemia, decreased plasma methionine levels and methylmalonic aciduria [63]. Elevated levels of methylmalonic acid and homocysteine accumulation in blood and tissues can cause endothelial cell damage, platelet activation and coagulation activation [64,65].

2.2.9 Coagulation Mediated TMA

Mutations of thrombomodulin, plasminogen, protein kinase C-associated protein, diacylglycerol kinase E can be associated with TMA, and are related to the role of coagulation factors in the pathogenesis of TMA. Loss of DGKE function and Protein Kinase C activation result in upregulation of pro thrombotic factors and downregulation of VEGF receptor thereby creating a prothrombotic state [66,67].

3. Diagnosis

In the right clinical context, presence of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and schistocytes (>2 per high powered field or >1% schistocytes) on a peripheral smear is often diagnostic. TMA is often associated with other lab abnormalities such as elevated LDH (lactate dehydrogenase), low haptoglobin, increased reticulocyte count and unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, which reflect MAHA. Direct Coombs test is negative in TMA. Often the coagulation parameters (Prothrombin Time, activated Partial Thromboplastin Time) are normal, however can be abnormal in severe clinical presentations with septic shock, DIC and end organ failure [5,6]. DIC itself is a MAHA and often it is very difficult to define an aHUS or TTP in the setting of active DIC. While MAHA is an essential feature for TMA, it is important to be aware that at times lung transplant patients need extracorporeal support either in pretransplant, or post-transplant or both phases and such extracorporeal support use can also result in MAHA. In such cases, obtaining baseline MAHA labs could help identify the syndrome sooner.

Cost, access, and turnaround time are often the limitations for certain TTP and complement specific testing. Treatment should not be delayed while waiting for such tests. On suspicion of TMA, ADAMTS13 or TTP specific testing and complement assessment should be performed in addition to the work up for the evaluation of the secondary conditions that could be associated with TMA.

3.1 TTP Assessment

Measurement of ADAMTS-13 activity, ADAMTS-13 Ag, and inhibitors can aid in the diagnosis and the cause of TTP. A plasma level of <10 IU/dL ADAMTS-13 activity confirms the TTP diagnosis [10,11,12,13]. Genetic testing to rule out congenital TTP should be considered if ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 inhibitor levels are undetectable.

3.2 Complement Assessment

Low levels of serum complement C3, C4 can be seen in several pathologies such as aHUS (C3 consumption only in 30-50% of patients), TTP, STEC-HUS and glomerulonephritis. Elevated soluble C5b-9 levels is a finding of terminal complement pathway overactivation [68]. Properdin, an alternate pathway regular, levels are reduced in complement activation [5]. Factor B levels could indicate a pathway involved in C3 consumption. Measurement of total hemolytic complement (CH50) is used to assess the classic complement activation pathway. Low levels of CH50 are seen in congenital complement deficiencies, complement factor deficiencies, increased consumption of complements, infections, and auto immune disease processes such as SLE [5]. Low levels of alternative pathway complements (AP50 assay) can be seen in FB, FD, FH and properdin deficiencies, aHUS and STEC-HUS [5,21,69]. Plasma MASP2 levels can be measured to assess the lectin pathway activation [70]. Anti CFH antibody testing (50-60% aHUS patients) and genetic mutational analysis (CFH, CFI, MCP, C3, CFB, THBD, CFH/CFHR hybrid gene, DGKE, PLG) should be considered in patients with aHUS picture [5,21,71,72].

3.3 Assessment of Secondary Factors

An assessment of secondary factors associated with TMA should include work up for infections, DIC, auto immune disease and cobalamin metabolism disorders.

Infectious work-up should include assessment for viral infections such as CMV, EBV (Epstein Barr Virus), adenovirus, parvovirus B19, BK virus, HIV, bacterial infections like streptococcus, and fungal infections like aspergillus. Stool Polymerase Chain Reaction testing or cultures for Shiga toxin E. coli should be considered in patients with abdominal symptoms and diarrhea [52,53,54,55]. Elevated levels of methylmalonic acid and homocysteine accumulation in the serum and urine samples are seen in Cobalamin C disease. Such abnormal tests should be followed by MMACHC genetic testing for confirmation [5,64]. Autoimmune testing should include antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA) antibodies, anti-extractable nuclear Ag antibodies, anti-topoisomerase I (anti Scl-70) antibody, anticentromere antibody (ACA) and anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies, anti-cardiolipin antibody, anti-b2GP-1 antibody, and lupus anticoagulant (LA) [62,63].

3.4 Histopathology

Histopathological confirmation is not mandatory for TMA diagnosis. Often, such a need can be particularly challenging. TMA diagnosis is often made on clinical grounds with an etiological and an exclusion approach. The classic histological signs of TMA include endothelial cell swelling, luminal fibrin platelet thrombi, and minimal or absent inflammation. Vasculature changes may include intimal swelling, proliferation, and necrosis of the arterial wall or thrombi in lumen [4,5,73,74]. Positive C5b-9 staining in kidney, skin clues towards complement-mediated TMA [73]. Autopsy studies have demonstrated such histological signs in organs such as heart, lungs, and brain. If feasible, kidney, skin, GI system are the suggested sites for biopsy [73,74].

4. Treatment

Given there are no general guidelines for treatment of TMA, treatment must be individualized based on the mechanism and underlying causative factors of disease to yield optimal patient outcomes. Prior to organ transplantation, it is ideal to minimize the risk of complement over-activation before donation, prevent hypoperfusion during the process or organ procurement, and avoid prolonged cold ischemia time [75].

4.1 Immunosuppression Considerations

In the setting of de novo TMA post-transplantation occurring secondary to immunosuppression, the offending agent should be reduced or stopped immediately. This occurs most commonly in the setting of CNI use post-transplant and the patient is typically switched to the alternative CNI or an MTOR inhibitor once deemed clinically appropriate based on TMA resolution [76]. In cases where continuation of a CNI is desired, tacrolimus can be switched to cyclosporine and vice versa. Verbiest et al. conducted a review of the literature of TMA management in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients. Patients were converted to the alternative CNI in 63 of the cases that were analyzed and 95% of patients had positive outcomes; although it should be noted that these cases were primarily mild in terms of TMA severity [77]. As previously mentioned, switching patients from a CNI to an MTOR inhibitor can also be considered along with using an MTOR inhibitor in combination with a CNI at a reduced dose. However, this strategy carries a risk of limitations as MTOR inhibitors can promote various adverse effects such as thrombotic events and TMA. In a case report presented by Negrini et al., after a kidney transplant recipient was switched from tacrolimus to sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression, the patient subsequently developed deep vein thrombosis, ischemic colitis, and biopsy proven TMA [78]. Additionally, it must be considered that MTOR inhibitors also demonstrate additional adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity, myelosuppression, and lower immunosuppressive potency compared to CNIs [79,80]. As a result, patients must be monitored diligently when switched to MTOR inhibitors in this setting and the decision should be balanced with the risk of graft rejection.

In the setting of de novo TMA induced by immunosuppression, another alternative agent that can be considered is Belatacept as it has not been shown to have similar endothelial toxicity properties to those seen with CNIs and MTOR inhibitors. Belatacept is a cytotoxic T lymphocyte 4-immunoglobulin fusion protein that prevents the activation of T cells that block the CD28 costimulation pathway [75,76]. Successful use of Belatacept as an alternative immunosuppressant in setting of post-transplant TMA was first described in case report by Ashman et al. In this case, a kidney transplant recipient experienced three episodes of drug-induced TMA associated with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus before the patient was transitioned to Belatacept. Once converted and after nine months of follow-up, the patient had complete TMA resolution along with no significant drug adverse events noted [81]. In a cohort of 115 kidney transplant recipients presented by Morel et al. where three-year outcomes were assessed in patients converted from a calcineurin inhibitor to Belatacept, 11 patients were identified to have a diagnosis of CNI-induced TMA. After patients were converted to Belatacept, all cases of TMA resolved along with a 92% graft survival rate at three years post-conversion [82]. While Belatacept can be considered in this setting, it must be noted that it has been demonstrated in multiple investigations to have higher rates of acute rejection, particularly in renal transplantation, when compared to traditional immunosuppression along with potential increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [82,83,84,85].

While immunosuppression should be altered in the setting of acute drug-induced TMA to avoid a poor prognosis, the causative agent can be rechallenged if deemed clinically appropriate or necessary by the clinician. However, outcomes utilizing this strategy are conflicting when evaluated in different types of solid organ transplant based on available case report data [77].

4.2 Plasma Exchange

In the setting of post-transplant TMA that is unresponsive to conventional measures or associated with antibody-mediated rejection, plasma exchange (PE) or plasmapheresis (PP) can be considered along with concomitant IVIG and additional immunosuppression if indicated [75]. However, it is important to note that the use of plasma exchange in the setting of TMA induced by CNIs or MTOR inhibitors is not well established and should be considered on an individualized patient-specific basis according to the American Society for Apheresis guidelines [77]. Additionally, randomized controlled trials are lacking on the use of plasma exchange in this setting for both hematopoietic and solid organ transplant recipients. Based on available case report data, it is challenging to draw any concrete conclusions given the heterogeneity of the findings as some case reports found withdrawal of the CNI to be the optimal choice, others found no difference between plasma exchange or CNI conversion, while others found worse outcomes in patients that were treated with plasma exchange alone [28,86,87,88].

Patients that develop TMA because of antibody-mediated rejection tend to respond significantly better to plasma exchange and concomitant IVIG compared to drug-induced TMA. Plasma exchange can remove HLA-specific antibodies while IVIG can further suppress alloantibodies and modulate immune response [76]. In a retrospective review of renal allograft biopsies, Satoskar et al found a TMA prevalence of 13.6% in patients with C4d positive biopsies compared to 3.6% in C4d negative biopsies. While not a statistically significant finding, they found that patients with C4d positive TMA that received plasma exchange had a lower rate of graft loss compared to those that did not [89]. In another investigation, Satoskar et al. analyzed outcomes of patients with graft dysfunction. They evaluated patient outcomes and compared two-year graft survival in patients with C4d positive AMR-associated graft dysfunction who received plasmapheresis and IVIG to those who did not receive therapy. While receipt of plasmapheresis and IVIG did not show significant improvement survival and graft function in the overall cohort at 2 years post-transplant, all patients with TMA in the study cohort who received plasmapheresis sand IVIG had functioning grafts at the two-year follow up indicating the beneficial effects of plasma exchange and IVIG in this setting [90].

As previously discussed, utilization of plasma exchange should be individualized based on the causative factor of TMA for the patient to balance the potential benefits vs. risks and adverse effects of therapy including thrombosis, bleeding, infection, and hypotension.

4.3 Complement Directed Therapy

The role of complement as a target for TA-TMA has increased based on efficacy seen in the treatment of aHUS and the similarities in activation of the complement system. Anti-complement therapies target the underlying complement-mediated vascular lesion [91]. C5 inhibitors are humanized monoclonal antibodies that bind to the complement protein C5, preventing cleavage into C5a and C5b which inhibits the formation of terminal complex C5b-9, including the formation of MAC. Eculizumab is a C5 inhibitor currently indicated for the treatment of PNH, aHUS, gMG and NMOSD. Ravulizumab, derived from eculizumab, exhibits high-affinity binding, as well as substitution of 4 amino acids in the complementary binding and neonatal Fc regions of the eculizumab backbone, leading to a terminal half-life that is approximately 4 times than that of eculizumab. Ravulizumab is currently indicated for the treatment of PNH, aHUS and gMG [92,93,94]. Alternative complement pathway activation plays a role in the pathogenesis of TA-TMA; therefore, suggesting the utility of eculizumab and ravulizumab in the setting of TA-TMA.

Literature on eculizumab use for TA-TMA has been historically limited to HSCT [95]. Jodele et al. described the use of eculizumab in a pediatric cohort of 64 patients with high-risk TA-TMA. The study demonstrated a response rate of 64% and 1-year survival rate of 66% after HSCT, compared with a 16.7% survival rate in a historical control cohort [96]. de Fontbrune et al. reported use of eculizumab in an adult cohort of 12 patients with TA-TMA after allogeneic HSCT with severe TMA with neurological and/or renal involvement. At a median follow-up time of 14 months, hematological response and overall survival were 50% and 33%, respectively, demonstrating a favorable response [97].

ECULISHU, a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled study did not show clear benefit of using early eculizumab on duration of renal replacement therapy in patients with milder presentation. However, the study excluded patients with severe complications for ethical reasons [98].

Gonzales et al. reported the use of ravulizumab for TA-TMA due to medication availability instead of eculizumab. The patient demonstrated response within 2 weeks after initiation of ravulizumab, with a total of 5 maintenance doses leading to successful complement blockade and clinical improvement [99].

Literature in solid organ transplant recipients is primarily found in renal transplant recipients, with eculizumab as the primary complement directed therapy. Eculizumab has been successfully used in de novo TA-TMA after kidney transplantation [75]. Portolés et al. described 22 patients with TA-TMA, with early (<1 month) and late (>1-month post-transplant) onset TMA. Patients responded better with a shorter time between TMA diagnosis and beginning of treatment with eculizumab [100]. Dhakal et al. describe a retrospective analysis of 26 cases, with TA-TMA occurring in 17 (65%) solid organ transplant (41 kidney, 29 small bowel, 12 liver, 12 simultaneous pancreas and kidney, and 6 combined lung and kidney) and 9 (35%) stem-cell transplant recipients. The median time to initiation of eculizumab from transplant was 63 days, with 92% of cohort recovering after eculizumab administration. 18 (95%) of patients received induction therapy, and maintenance therapy was continued in 20 (77%) patients [101].

With the treatment, a statistical difference was noted in renal recovery, with most of it occurring within the first 30 days and the median time for platelets to normalize was about 4 days. Factors such as shorter time between the clinical presentation and first dose of eculizumab, younger age, lower creatinine, and lower platelet counts were associated with better renal recovery and function with eGFR > 60 ml per min at 6 months [102].

The dosing of eculizumab and ravulizumab are not well established in TA-TMA; however, the established dosing regimen for aHUS is commonly used, including an induction phase, followed by a maintenance phase. In cases where complement directed therapy is utilized alongside plasma exchange, supplemental doses are recommended before, or within 1 hour, after plasma exchange [93,94]. The utilization of complement directed therapy should be individualized and consider potential benefits versus risks and adverse effects including, meningococcal infection and infusion-related reactions. Administration of meningococcal vaccinations within 2 weeks of initiation, is recommended with the use of eculizumab and ravulizumab. Often patients are immunosuppressed, prophylactic antibiotics should be considered, in addition to vaccination, for the entire duration of treatment with eculizumab or ravulizumab. The duration of treatment with complement directed therapy is unknown; however, discontinuation of therapy can be considered once complications of TA-TMA have completely resolved, including resolution of hematologic markers and complement blockade determined by CH50 levels.

5. Conclusions

Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and thrombocytopenia, often targets vasculature in kidneys, brain, gastrointestinal system, heart, and skin. If unrecognized and or if left untreated can result in severe multiorgan failure and death. Treatment should not be delayed while waiting for TTP and complement specific tests. In addition to the identification of causative factors and their treatment, terminal complement blockade should be considered especially if there is a suspicion for complement mediated TMA.

List of Abbreviations


The specified authors did not receive any funding for this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Sravanthi Nandavaram has written the manuscript. Rickey Evans and Hannah Twist have written the treatment section of the manuscript. Sravanthi Paluri, Ana Castellanos assisted with the editing. Andres Pelaez assisted with the reviewing and editing.

Competing Interests

The specified authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.


  1. Brocklebank V, Wood KM, Kavanagh D. Thrombotic microangiopathy and the kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13: 300-317. [CrossRef]
  2. Campistol JM, Arias M, Ariceta G, Blasco M, Espinosa L, Espinosa M, et al. An update for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: Diagnosis and treatment. A consensus document. Nefrología. 2015; 35: 421-447. [CrossRef]
  3. Wirtschafter E, VanBeek C, Linhares Y. Bone marrow transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy without peripheral blood schistocytes: A case report and review of the literature. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2018; 7: 14. [CrossRef]
  4. George JN, Nester CM. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 654-666. [CrossRef]
  5. Blasco M, Guillen E, Quintana LF, Garcia-Herrera A, Pineiro G, Poch E, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathies assessment: Mind the complement. Clin Kidney J. 2021; 14: 1055-1066. [CrossRef]
  6. Arnold DM, Patriquin CJ, Nazy I. Thrombotic microangiopathies: A general approach to diagnosis and management. CMAJ. 2017; 189: E153-E139. [CrossRef]
  7. Mariotte E, Azoulay E, Galicier L, Rondeau E, Zouiti F, Boisseau P, et al. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of adulthood-onset thrombotic microangiopathy with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura): A cross-sectional analysis of the French national registry for thrombotic microangiopathy. Lancet Haematol. 2016; 3: e237-e245. [CrossRef]
  8. Staley EM, Cao W, Pham HP, Kim CH, Kocher NK, Zheng L, et al. Clinical factors and biomarkers predict outcome in patients with immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Haematologica. 2019; 104: 166-175. [CrossRef]
  9. Levy GG, Nichols WC, Lian EC, Foroud T, McClintick JN, McGee BM, et al. Mutations in a member of the ADAMTS gene family cause thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nature. 2001; 413: 488-494. [CrossRef]
  10. Saha M, McDaniel JK, Zheng XL. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and potential novel therapeutics. J Thromb Haemost. 2017; 15: 1889-1900. [CrossRef]
  11. Righini M, Le Gal G, De Lucia S, Roy PM, Meyer G, Aujesky D, et al. Clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2006; 95: 715-719. PMID: 16601844 [CrossRef]
  12. Camilleri RS, Scully M, Thomas M, Mackie IJ, Liesner R, Chen WJ, et al. A phenotype-genotype correlation of ADAMTS13 mutations in congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura patients treated in the United Kingdom. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10: 1792-1801. [CrossRef]
  13. Terrell DR, Williams LA, Vesely SK, Lämmle B, Hovinga JK, George JN. The incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura‐hemolytic uremic syndrome: All patients, idiopathic patients, and patients with severe ADAMTS‐13 deficiency. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 1432-1436. [CrossRef]
  14. Sánchez-Luceros A, Farías CE, Amaral MM, Kempfer AC, Votta R, Marchese C, et al. von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) activity in normal non-pregnant women, pregnant and post-delivery women. Thromb Haemost. 2004; 92: 1320-1326. [CrossRef]
  15. Martin-Rodriguez S, Reverter JC, Tàssies D, Espinosa G, Heras M, Pino M, et al. Reduced ADAMTS13 activity is associated with thrombotic risk in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015; 24: 1143-1149. [CrossRef]
  16. Teixeira CM, Tedesco Silva Junior H, Moura LA, Proença HM, de Marco R, Gerbase de Lima M, et al. Clinical and pathological features of thrombotic microangiopathy influencing long-term kidney transplant outcomes. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0227445. [CrossRef]
  17. Yoshida Y, Kato H, Ikeda Y, Nangaku M. Pathogenesis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019; 26: 99-110. [CrossRef]
  18. Goodship TH, Cook HT, Fakhouri F, Fervenza FC, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Kavanagh D, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: Conclusions from a “kidney disease: Improving global outcomes” (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2017; 91: 539-551. [CrossRef]
  19. de Cordoba SR, Hidalgo MS, Pinto S, Tortajada A. Genetics of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014; 40: 422-430. [CrossRef]
  20. Noris M, Caprioli J, Bresin E, Mossali C, Pianetti G, Gamba S, et al. Relative role of genetic complement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and their impact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5: 1844-1859. [CrossRef]
  21. Bu F, Maga T, Meyer NC, Wang K, Thomas CP, Nester CM, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of complement and coagulation genes in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 25: 55-64. [CrossRef]
  22. Mayer CL, Leibowitz CS, Kurosawa S, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ. Shiga toxins and the pathophysiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans and animals. Toxins. 2012; 4: 1261-1287. [CrossRef]
  23. Jokiranta TS. HUS and atypical HUS. Blood. 2017; 129: 2847-2856. [CrossRef]
  24. Garg AX, Suri RS, Barrowman N, Rehman F, Matsell D, Rosas-Arellano MP, et al. Long-term renal prognosis of diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA. 2003; 290: 1360-1370. [CrossRef]
  25. Singh N, Gayowski T, Marino IR. Hemolytic uremic syndrome in solid-organ transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 1996; 9: 68-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00336815. PMID: 8748414. [CrossRef]
  26. Copelovitch L, Kaplan BS. The thrombotic microangiopathies. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008; 23: 1761-1767. [CrossRef]
  27. Jodele S. Complement in pathophysiology and treatment of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathies. Semin Hematol. 2018; 55: 159-166. [CrossRef]
  28. Mal H, Veyradier A, Brugière O, Da Silva D, Colombat M, Azoulay E, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy with acquired deficiency in ADAMTS 13 activity in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2006; 81: 1628-1632. [CrossRef]
  29. Gloude NJ, Khandelwal P, Luebbering N, Lounder DT, Jodele S, Alder MN, et al. Circulating dsDNA, endothelial injury, and complement activation in thrombotic microangiopathy and GVHD. Blood. 2017; 130: 1259-1266. [CrossRef]
  30. Ravindran M, Khan MA, Palaniyar N. Neutrophil extracellular trap formation: Physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Biomolecules. 2019; 9: 365. [CrossRef]
  31. Yuen J, Pluthero FG, Douda DN, Riedl M, Cherry A, Ulanova M, et al. NETosing neutrophils activate complement both on their own NETs and bacteria via alternative and non-alternative pathways. Front Immunol. 2016; 7: 137. [CrossRef]
  32. Ardissino G, Salardi S, Berra S, Colussi G, Cugno M, Zecca M, et al. Acquired complement regulatory gene mutations and hematopoietic stem cell transplant-related thrombotic microangiopathy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017; 23: 1580-1582. [CrossRef]
  33. Scully M, Brown J, Patel R, McDonald V, Brown CJ, Machin S. Human leukocyte antigen association in idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Evidence for an immunogenetic link. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8: 257-262. [CrossRef]
  34. Dvorak CC, Higham C, Shimano KA. Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: A practical approach to diagnosis and management. Front Pediatr. 2019; 7: 133. [CrossRef]
  35. Qi J, Wang J, Chen J, Su J, Tang Y, Wu X, et al. Plasma levels of complement activation fragments C3b and sC5b-9 significantly increased in patients with thrombotic microangiopathy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2017; 96: 1849-1855. [CrossRef]
  36. Commereuc M, Karras A, Amrein C, Boussaud V, Sberro-Soussan R, Guillemain R, et al. Successful treatment of acute thrombotic microangiopathy by eculizumab after combined lung and kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013; 96: e58-e59. [CrossRef]
  37. Adela M, Ramon SO, Mariana V, Thomas H, Giselle G. Early post-operative thrombotic microangiopathy in deceased donor kidney transplant: Case series. Transplantation. 2022; 106: S339-S340. [CrossRef]
  38. Metivier AC, Biondi G, Veyradier A, Geoffroy A, Lasocki S, Azoulay E, et al. 506: ADAMTS 13 activity in patients with suspected thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28: S241. [CrossRef]
  39. Hachem RR, Yusen RD, Chakinala MM, Aloush AA, Patterson GA, Trulock EP. Thrombotic microangiopathy after lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2006; 81: 57-63. [CrossRef]
  40. Fortin MC, Raymond MA, Madore F, Fugère JA, Pâquet M, St-Louis G, et al. Increased risk of thrombotic microangiopathy in patients receiving a cyclosporin-sirolimus combination. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4: 946-952. [CrossRef]
  41. Fyfe-Kirschner BS, Amoun T, Lee J, Uneze U, Khan U, Adeboye A. Atypical HUS in a lung transplant recipient with salmonellosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022; 41: S434. [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Nouri ZL, Reese JA, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, George JN. Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: A systematic review of published reports. Blood. 2015; 125: 616-618. [CrossRef]
  43. Gottschall JL, Neahring B, McFarland JG, Wu GG, Weitekamp LA, Aster RH. Quinine‐induced immune thrombocytopenia with hemolytic uremic syndrome: Clinical and serological findings in nine patients and review of literature. Am J Hematol. 1994; 47: 283-289. [CrossRef]
  44. Kojouri K, Vesely SK, George JN. Quinine-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome: Frequency, clinical features, and long-term outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 1047-1051. [CrossRef]
  45. Huynh M, Chee K, Lau DH. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with quetiapine. Ann Pharmacother. 2005; 39: 1346-1348. [CrossRef]
  46. Saif MW, Xyla V, Makrilia N, Bliziotis I, Syrigos K. Thrombotic microangiopathy associated with gemcitabine: Rare but real. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2009; 8: 257-260. [CrossRef]
  47. Bougie DW, Wilker PR, Aster RH. Patients with quinine-induced immune thrombocytopenia have both “drug-dependent” and “drug-specific” antibodies. Blood. 2006; 108: 922-927. [CrossRef]
  48. Sartelet H, Toupance O, Lorenzato M, Fadel F, Noel LH, Lagonotte E, et al. Sirolimus‐induced thrombotic microangiopathy is associated with decreased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5: 2441-2447. [CrossRef]
  49. Eremina V, Jefferson JA, Kowalewska J, Hochster H, Haas M, Weisstuch J, et al. VEGF inhibition and renal thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1129-1136. [CrossRef]
  50. Mazzierli T, Allegretta F, Maffini E, Allinovi M. Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: An updated review of causative drugs, pathophysiology, and management. Front Pharmacol. 2023; 13: 1088031. [CrossRef]
  51. Saab KR, Elhadad S, Copertino D, Laurence J. Thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of HIV infection: A case report and review of the differential diagnosis and therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016; 30: 359-364. [CrossRef]
  52. Alpers CE. Light at the end of the TUNEL: HIV-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 385-396. [CrossRef]
  53. Novitzky N, Thomson J, Abrahams L, Du Toit C, McDonald A. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with retroviral infection is highly responsive to plasma infusion therapy. Br J Haematol. 2005; 128: 373-379. [CrossRef]
  54. Waiser J, Budde K, Rudolph B, Ortner MA, Neumayer HH. De novo hemolytic uremic syndrome postrenal transplant after cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 34: 556-559. [CrossRef]
  55. Maslo C, Peraldi MN, Desenclos JC, Mougenot B, Cywiner-Golenzer C, Chatelet FP, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy and cytomegalovirus disease in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 1997; 24: 350-355. [CrossRef]
  56. Ville S, Le Bot S, Chapelet-Debout A, Blancho G, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Deltombe C, et al. Atypical HUS relapse triggered by COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2021; 99: 267-268. [CrossRef]
  57. Fakhouri F. Pregnancy-related thrombotic microangiopathies: Clues from complement biology. Transfus Apher Sci. 2016; 54: 199-202. [CrossRef]
  58. Tranquilli A, Dekker G, Magee L, Roberts J, Sibai BM, Steyn W, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014; 4: 97-104. [CrossRef]
  59. Fakhouri F, Roumenina L, Provot F, Sallée M, Caillard S, Couzi L, et al. Pregnancy-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome revisited in the era of complement gene mutations. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 21: 859-867. [CrossRef]
  60. Huerta A, Arjona E, Portoles J, Lopez-Sanchez P, Rabasco C, Espinosa M, et al. A retrospective study of pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2018; 93: 450-459. [CrossRef]
  61. George JN. Systemic malignancies as a cause of unexpected microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. Oncology. 2011; 25: 908-914.
  62. Song D, Wu LH, Wang FM, Yang XW, Zhu D, Chen M, et al. The spectrum of renal thrombotic microangiopathy in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013; 15: R12. [CrossRef]
  63. Geraghty MT, Perlman EJ, Martin LS, Hayflick SJ, Casella JF, Rosenblatt DS, et al. Cobalamin C defect associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome. J Pediatr. 1992; 120: 934-937. [CrossRef]
  64. Baumgartner MR, Hörster F, Dionisi-Vici C, Haliloglu G, Karall D, Chapman KA, et al. Proposed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of methylmalonic and propionic acidemia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014; 9: 130. [CrossRef]
  65. Coppola A, Davi G, De Stefano V, Mancini FP, Cerbone AM, Di Minno G. Homocysteine, coagulation, platelet function, and thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000; 26: 243-254. [CrossRef]
  66. Lemaire M, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Schaefer F, Choi M, Tang WH, Le Quintrec M, et al. Recessive mutations in DGKE cause atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 531-536. [CrossRef]
  67. Quaggin SE. DGKE and atypical HUS. Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 475-476. [CrossRef]
  68. Noris M, Galbusera M, Gastoldi S, Macor P, Banterla F, Bresin E, et al. Dynamics of complement activation in aHUS and how to monitor eculizumab therapy. Blood. 2014; 124: 1715-1726. [CrossRef]
  69. Angioi A, Fervenza FC, Sethi S, Zhang Y, Smith RJ, Murray D, et al. Diagnosis of complement alternative pathway disorders. Kidney Int. 2016; 89: 278-288. [CrossRef]
  70. Elhadad S, Chapin J, Copertino D, Van Besien K, Ahamed J, Laurence J. MASP2 levels are elevated in thrombotic microangiopathies: Association with microvascular endothelial cell injury and suppression by anti-MASP2 antibody narsoplimab. Clin Exp Immunol. 2021; 203: 96-104. [CrossRef]
  71. Scully M, Hunt BJ, Benjamin S, Liesner R, Rose P, Peyvandi F, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and other thrombotic microangiopathies. Br J Haematol. 2012; 158: 323-335. [CrossRef]
  72. Wu N, Liu J, Yang S, Kellett ET, Cataland SR, Li H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic values of ADAMTS 13 activity measured during daily plasma exchange therapy in patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Transfusion. 2015; 55: 18-24. [CrossRef]
  73. Magro CM, Momtahen S, Mulvey JJ, Yassin AH, Kaplan RB, Laurence JC. Role of the skin biopsy in the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Dermatopathol. 2015; 37: 349-359. [CrossRef]
  74. El-Bietar J, Warren M, Dandoy C, Myers KC, Lane A, Wallace G, et al. Histologic features of intestinal thrombotic microangiopathy in pediatric and young adult patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015; 21: 1994-2001. [CrossRef]
  75. Ávila A, Gavela E, Sancho A. Thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation: An underdiagnosed and potentially reversible entity. Front Med. 2021; 8: 642864. [CrossRef]
  76. Imanifard Z, Liguori L, Remuzzi G. TMA in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2023; 107: 2329-2340. [CrossRef]
  77. Verbiest A, Pirenne J, Dierickx D. De novo thrombotic microangiopathy after non-renal solid organ transplantation. Blood Rev. 2014; 28: 269-279. [CrossRef]
  78. Negrini S, Durrbach A, Becquemont L. Sirolimus-related systemic thrombotic microangiopathy after renal transplantation. Therapie. 2014; 69: 175-177. [CrossRef]
  79. Säemann MD, Remuzzi G. Time to rethink immunosuppression by mTOR inhibitors? Nat Rev Nephrol. 2009; 5: 611-612. [CrossRef]
  80. Pallet N, Thervet E, Legendre C, Anglicheau D. Sirolimus early graft nephrotoxicity: Clinical and experimental data. Curr Drug Saf. 2006; 1: 179-187. [CrossRef]
  81. Ashman N, Chapagain A, Dobbie H, Raftery MJ, Sheaff MT, Yaqoob MM. Belatacept as maintenance immunosuppression for postrenal transplant de novo drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9: 424-427. [CrossRef]
  82. Morel A, Hoisnard L, Dudreuilh C, Moktefi A, Kheav D, Pimentel A, et al. Three-year outcomes in kidney transplant recipients switched from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept as a rescue therapy. Transpl Int. 2022; 35: 10228. [CrossRef]
  83. Vincenti F, Charpentier B, Vanrenterghem Y, Rostaing L, Bresnahan B, Darji P, et al. A phase III study of belatacept‐based immunosuppression regimens versus cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients (BENEFIT study). Am J Transplant. 2010; 10: 535-546. [CrossRef]
  84. Vincenti F, Rostaing L, Grinyo J, Rice K, Steinberg S, Gaite L, et al. Belatacept and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 333-343. [CrossRef]
  85. van der Zwan M, Hesselink DA, van den Hoogen MW, Baan CC. Costimulation blockade in kidney transplant recipients. Drugs. 2020; 80: 33-46. [CrossRef]
  86. Shindoh J, Sugawara Y, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, Tamura S, Yamashiki N, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy after living-donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12: 728-736. [CrossRef]
  87. Tamura S, Sugawara Y, Matsui Y, Kishi Y, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy in living-donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2005; 80: 169-175. [CrossRef]
  88. Hori T, Kaido T, Oike F, Ogura Y, Ogawa K, Yonekawa Y, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy-like disorder after living-donor liver transplantation: A single-center experience in Japan. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17: 1848-1857. [CrossRef]
  89. Satoskar AA, Pelletier R, Adams P, Nadasdy GM, Brodsky S, Pesavento T, et al. De novo thrombotic microangiopathy in renal allograft biopsies-role of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10: 1804-1811. [CrossRef]
  90. Satoskar AA, Pelletier R, Nadasdy GM, Henry M, Ferguson R, Nadasdy T. Histopathology and outcome of acute humoral rejection in renal allografts. Front Biosci. 2011; 3: 919-928. [CrossRef]
  91. Horiuchi T, Tsukamoto H. Complement-targeted therapy: Development of C5-and C5a-targeted inhibition. Inflamm Regen. 2016; 36: 11. [CrossRef]
  92. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Soliris (eculizumab) [Internet]. Boston, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2024. Available from: https://solirisnmosd-hcp.com/.
  93. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ultomiris (ravulizumab) [Internet]. Boston, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2024. Available from: https://alexion.com/en/our-medicines/medicines/ultomiris.
  94. Lee JW, Sicre de Fontbrune F, Wong Lee Lee L, Pessoa V, Gualandro S, Füreder W, et al. Ravulizumab (ALXN1210) vs eculizumab in adult patients with PNH naive to complement inhibitors: the 301 study. Blood. 2019; 133: 530-539. [CrossRef]
  95. Young JA, Pallas CR, Knovich MA. Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: Theoretical considerations and a practical approach to an unrefined diagnosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021; 56: 1805-1817. [CrossRef]
  96. Jodele S, Dandoy CE, Lane A, Laskin BL, Teusink-Cross A, Myers KC, et al. Complement blockade for TA-TMA: Lessons learned from a large pediatric cohort treated with eculizumab. Blood. 2020; 135: 1049-1057. [CrossRef]
  97. de Fontbrune FS, Galambrun C, Sirvent A, Huynh A, Faguer S, Nguyen S, et al. Use of eculizumab in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: A study from the SFGM-TC. Transplantation. 2015; 99: 1953-1959. [CrossRef]
  98. Garnier A, Brochard K, Kwon T, Sellier-Leclerc AL, Lahoche A, Launay EA, et al. Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in pediatric patients affected by Shiga toxin-related hemolytic and uremic syndrome: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023; 34: 1561-1573. [CrossRef]
  99. Gonzales MR, White JC, Davidow KA, Mangum DS, Grimm KE. Novel use of ravulizumab in transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: Case report. J Hematol Oncol Pharm. 2023; 13: 102-106.
  100. Portoles J, Huerta A, Arjona E, Gavela E, Agüera M, Jimenez C, et al. Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: A retrospective national study. Clin Kidney J. 2021; 14: 1173-1180. [CrossRef]
  101. Dhakal P, Giri S, Pathak R, Bhatt VR. Eculizumab in transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017; 23: 175-180. [CrossRef]
  102. Brocklebank V, Walsh PR, Smith-Jackson K, Hallam TM, Marchbank KJ, Wilson V, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the era of terminal complement inhibition: An observational cohort study. Blood. 2023; 142: 1371-1386. [CrossRef]
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0